Results 261 to 270 of about 22,542,366 (287)

The Impact of Double-Blind Peer Review on Gender Bias in Scientific Publishing:A Systematic Review.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022
OBJECTIVE Gender-based bias during journal peer review can lead to publication biases and perpetuate gender inequality in science. Double-blind peer review, in which the names of authors and reviewers are masked, may present an opportunity for the ...
A. Kern-Goldberger   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review

arXiv.org
Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific publishing, yet it suffers from inconsistencies, reviewer subjectivity, and scalability challenges.
Gaurav Sahu   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study.

Diabetes & metabolic syndrome
BACKGROUND Peer review is the established method for evaluating the quality and validity of research manuscripts in scholarly publishing. However, scientific peer review faces challenges as the volume of submitted research has steadily increased in ...
A. Saad   +7 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Adapting peer review for the future: Digital disruptions and trust in peer review

Learned Publishing
Academia is undergoing transformation with rapid technological advancements, global collaboration, and the rise of AI. Maintaining research integrity is paramount in the face of new challenges and opportunities.
Harini Calamur, Roohi Ghosh
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing

J. Informetrics, 2022
Guang-Yao Zhang   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy