Results 171 to 180 of about 3,686,127 (204)

Quantitative Evaluation of Isotope Nephrograms

Acta Radiologica. Diagnosis, 1972
A, Fritjofsson, J E, Persson, B, Söderholm, K J, Vikterlöf   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2017
Cynthia Morata-Tarifa, Joyce M Slingerland   +1 more
exaly  

Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020
Aaron J Grossberg, William L Hwang, Anirban Maitra   +2 more
exaly  

Evaluating quantitative research reports.

Nephrology nursing journal : journal of the American Nephrology Nurses' Association, 2005
As a novice reviewer, it is often difficult to trust your evaluation of a research report. You may feel uncertain in your interpretations. These are common concerns and can be remedied by reading and discussing research reports on research listservs, through journal clubs, or with other nephrology nurses. Practice using the criteria for research report
openaire   +1 more source

Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2012
Joel B Epstein, Rene-Jean Bensadoun, Andrei Barasch   +2 more
exaly  

Quantitative Evaluation

2001
openaire   +1 more source

Comments on Quantitative Test Evaluation

Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 1982
openaire   +2 more sources

The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping‐up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018
Pricivel M Carrera, Hagop M Kantarjian, Victoria S Blinder   +2 more
exaly  

Quantitative Evaluation

1999
openaire   +1 more source

Quantitative specification evaluation

Microelectronics Reliability, 1980
openaire   +1 more source