Results 21 to 30 of about 975,689 (295)
Quaestio Facti, 2020 In contemporary legal epistemology it is common to talk about the “paradox of expert testimony”, which can be formulated as follows: “how can the judge assess information provided by an expert witness if he needs him precisely because of his own lack of ...
Gaetano Carlizzi
doaj +1 more source
Challenge of Arbitrators in ICSID Investment Arbitration: A Critique and an Appropriate Solution [PDF]
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī, 2018 Challenge of arbitrators is a controversial issue in international arbitration in general and in ICSID Arbitration in particular. There is a consensus that the lack of impartiality and independency leads arbitrators to be challenged.
علی مقدم ابریشمی
doaj +1 more source
Open questions in quarkonium and electromagnetic probes [PDF]
, 2006 In my ("not a summary") talk at the Hard Probes 2006 conference, I gave "a personal and surely biased view on only a few of the many open questions on quarkonium and electromagnetic probes".
Abreu +18 more
core +3 more sources
Judging Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt
Quaestio FactiThe doubt is not related to innocence but only to guilt, the latter being the exclusive object of the process. The proof of guilt, being always of inductive nature, cannot accept the deductive method that connotes the relationship between premise (minor
Rocco Neri
doaj +1 more source
Indirect Evidence – A Constitutional-Legal Basis for Conviction? [PDF]
Journal of Constitutional Law, 2023 The practice of Georgia’s general courts in applying a ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ standard being necessary for convicting a defendant is inconsistent. Whereas until recently, at least two direct pieces of evidence were required to convict a person, in its
Mariam Chikadze , Irakli Jojua
doaj
Legal Burdens of Proof and Statistical Evidence [PDF]
, 2018 In order to perform certain actions – such as incarcerating a person or revoking parental rights – the state must establish certain facts to a particular standard of proof. These standards – such as preponderance of evidence and beyond reasonable doubt –
Gardiner, Georgi
core +1 more source
Reanalyzing of the "criterion" of doubt destroying the responsibility and punishment in the thought of Imamie jurisprudents [PDF]
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i Kiyfarī, 2019 Despite the controversy about the effect of doubt on the abandonment of punishment and the overwhelming acceptance of this issue in Articles 120 and 121 of the Islamic penal code, it has been argued that there is a controversial issue in the elimination ...
ehsan ailakbari +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Must Jurors Know the Stakes of Conviction? Sentencing, Encroachment, and Legal Proof
Political PhilosophyA recent view in legal epistemology holds that since knowledge is the standard for proof of criminal guilt, and since there is pragmatic encroachment on knowledge, contrary to current trial practice juries should be told the sentence a defendant would ...
Eleanor Gordon-Smith, John Colin Bradley
doaj +2 more sources
The standard of proof the fact of legal presumption of respect
Law: Journal of the University of Latvia, 2022 In democratic countries, the presumption of innocence is one of the pillars of criminal justice, a symbol of respect of the person as the highest social value. It is a fundamental principle of criminal justice, the important warranty of human rights and
Dace Radzeviča
doaj
SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences, 2019 Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of Candida in the saliva of uncontrolled and controlled group of type II diabetic and in nondiabetic individuals. Settings and Design: This was a cross-sectional study.
Saramma Mathew Fenn +2 more
doaj +1 more source