Results 21 to 30 of about 668,176 (276)

A Reasonable Doubt About Reasonable Doubt [PDF]

, 2013
The Supreme Court has failed to define the concept of “reasonable doubt” with any precision. The Court tolerates conflicting definitions of “reasonable doubt.” It permits some jurisdictions to forbid any definition of “reasonable doubt,” while giving ...
Shealy, Miller W., Jr.
core   +1 more source

THE REASONABLE DOUBT IN THE ROMANIAN CRIMINAL TRIAL [PDF]

Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 2015
This work represents a doctrinary approach with certain judiciary practice highlights of the manner in which the standard regarding the evidence “beyond any reasonable doubt” can be found in the new Criminal Procedure Code.
Bogdan MICU
doaj  

La fuerza de la sangre, beyond a reasonable doubt: la cuestión del doble final

Verba Hispanica, 1992
En noviembre de 1990, durante el Tercer Coloquio Internacional de la Asociación de Cervantistas, celebrado en Alcalá de Henares, la profesora Ellen Lokos de la universidad de Harvard, USA, en la comunicación titulada Máscaras, mentiras, matrimonio final:
Matías Escalera Cordero
doaj   +1 more source

Standardisation of prof by investigating judges when exercising their powers to consider requests for permission to conduct procedural actions

Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 2023
Based on the modern achievements of the national science in criminal procedure and the development of the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings, in particular, its standardization, the author examines the theoretical prerequisites for ...
R. M. Balats
doaj   +1 more source

Some implications of an epistemic-intersubjective interpretation of the “beyond all reasonable doubt” standard of proof for criminal investigations

Ciencia Ergo Sum, 2020
Se presenta la propuesta del profesor Ferrer de dotar de contenido epistémico-intersubjetivo al ampliamente usado estándar de prueba penal que autoriza una condena sólo si se ha demostrado la culpabilidad del acusado más allá de toda duda razonable.
Edgar R. Aguilera
doaj   +1 more source

Judging Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt

Quaestio Facti
The doubt is not related to innocence but only to guilt, the latter being the exclusive object of the process. The proof of guilt, being always of inductive nature, cannot accept the deductive method that connotes the relationship between premise (minor
Rocco Neri
doaj   +1 more source

From Doubt to Despair

Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 2022
‘Gaslighting’ describes a form of manipulation that induces doubt in someone’s perceptions, experiences, understanding of events or conception of reality in general. But what kind of doubt is it?
Jasmin Trächtler
doaj   +1 more source

Scientific Questions of Fact Between Free Evaluation of Evidence and Proof Beyond any Reasonable Doubt in the Criminal Trial

Quaestio Facti, 2020
In contemporary legal epistemology it is common to talk about the “paradox of expert testimony”, which can be formulated as follows: “how can the judge assess information provided by an expert witness if he needs him precisely because of his own lack of ...
Gaetano Carlizzi
doaj   +1 more source

Challenge of Arbitrators in ICSID Investment Arbitration: A Critique and an Appropriate Solution [PDF]

Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī, 2018
Challenge of arbitrators is a controversial issue in international arbitration in general and in ICSID Arbitration in particular. There is a consensus that the lack of impartiality and independency leads arbitrators to be challenged.
علی مقدم ابریشمی
doaj   +1 more source

Must Jurors Know the Stakes of Conviction? Sentencing, Encroachment, and Legal Proof

Political Philosophy
A recent view in legal epistemology holds that since knowledge is the standard for proof of criminal guilt, and since there is pragmatic encroachment on knowledge, contrary to current trial practice juries should be told the sentence a defendant would ...
Eleanor Gordon-Smith, John Colin Bradley
doaj   +2 more sources