Results 251 to 260 of about 2,499,352 (307)

Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. [PDF]

BMJ Open
Tempia Valenta S, Conti A, Porru F, Giovannardi G, Andersen I, Bramer WM, Atti AR, De Ronchi D, Panella M, Hubloue I.   +9 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Reasons for and against presymptomatic genetic testing in frontotemporal dementia: a qualitative study. [PDF]

Hum Genet
Graafland CH, Seelaar H, Panman JL, van Swieten JC, Bunnik EM, Donker Kaat L.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the impact of prior vaginal deliveries on outcomes. [PDF]

Arch Gynecol Obstet
Bashan Y, Shalev Maman E, Rosenberg R, Yekel Y, Weintraub A, Duvdevani NR, Pasternak Y.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Identification of culling reasons, intervals, and risk factors by postpartum period classification in dairy farms. [PDF]

Anim Biosci
Kang HG, Jeong JK, Kim IH.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning

Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1996
Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a formal framework for assessing conflicting arguments. Its use is illustrated with applications to realistic legal examples, and the potential for implementation is discussed. The framework has the form of a logical system for defeasible argumentation.
Prakken, H., Sartor, G.
openaire   +1 more source

APPROXIMATE REASONING ABOUT PRIORITIES OF IMPRECISE CONFLICTING REQUIREMENTS

International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 1995
Elasticity in an imprecise requirement needs to be captured to enable the trade-off analysis of conflicting requirements. One of the most important issues in the trade-off analysis of conflicting requirements is to understand their priorities. Requirement analysts need to know not only the relative ordering of requirements based on their importance ...
JOHN YEN, XIAOQING LIU
openaire   +1 more source

Comments on Reason for Conflicting Results of Venography

Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 1993
Conflicting results of phlebography in the diagnosis of thrombosis in different investigations are discussed. The following factors may explain different results: phlebography is a subjective method, not based on measurable parameters; insufficient phlebographic technique may result in unsafe diagnosis; the selection of patient material may vary in ...
openaire   +2 more sources

The research on conflict redistribution of evidential reasoning

2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, 2010
The evidential reasoning theory is often used to process the decision information in decision support. The evidential reasoning is qualified in dealing with uncertain information. However, its combination rules always have some limitations in processing conflict information.
null Jian Gao, null Weitai Liang, null Jingjing Yan   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source