Results 181 to 190 of about 95,388 (302)
Scientific conduct and misconduct: honesty is still the best policy
, 2012 Neelesh Dahanukar, Sanjay Molur
openalex +2 more sources
Using Affirmative Action as a Tiebreaker
Journal of Applied Philosophy, EarlyView.ABSTRACT We argue in favor of affirmative action. There are two central points to our argument. First, if two or more candidates for a position are matched in competence, then one ought to prefer a candidate from a disadvantaged, disenfranchised, or minority background rather than defer to the outcome of a lottery.
Shalom Chalson, James Bernard Willoughby
wiley +1 more source
Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. [PDF]
Med Health Care Philos, 2018 Helgesson G, Eriksson S.
europepmc +1 more source
A structural view of corporate purposes
European Management Review, EarlyView.
Margaret Blair +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Belief in a Norm‐Consistent Climate Policy Conspiracy Theory and Non‐Normative Collective Action
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Volume 55, Issue 5, Page 343-358, May 2025.ABSTRACT Believing in conspiracy theories is connected to support for non‐normative collective action. One explanation might be that this is due to both being non‐normative. Alternatively, it might be the case that non‐normative action appears justified based on what conspiracy theories alleging harm to a personally relevant group due to powerholders ...
Lotte Pummerer +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Journal of Clinical Nursing, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Aim To analyse predictors of burnout in nursing professionals during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic. Design Cohort study. Method A two‐phase study conducted during the COVID‐19 pandemic's peak (2020) and post‐vaccination period (2022). Data from nursing professionals of four hospitals in southern Brazil included sociodemographic, occupational,
Miguel Lucas Silva da Paixão +7 more
wiley +1 more source
View point: Retraction is a pain but scientific misconduct is a crime! [PDF]
Ann Card Anaesth, 2018 Tewari P.
europepmc +1 more source
Do robots boost productivity? A quantitative meta‐study
Journal of Economic Surveys, EarlyView.ABSTRACT This meta‐study analyzes the productivity effects of industrial robots. More than 1800 estimates from 85 primary studies are collected. The meta‐analytic evidence suggests that robotization has so far provided, at best, a small boost to productivity. There is strong evidence of publication bias in the positive direction.
Florian Schneider
wiley +1 more source
Scientific misconduct: Past, present, and future … [PDF]
, 2002 M. Stutzmann, Stefan Hildebrandt
openalex +1 more source