Results 91 to 100 of about 209 (131)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999Because sequential lineups reduce false-positive choices, their use has been recommended (R. C. L. Lindsay, 1999; R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985). Blind testing is included in the recommended procedures. Police, concerned about blind testing, devised alternative procedures, including self-administered sequential lineups, to reduce use of relative
R C, Lindsay, K, Bellinger
openaire +2 more sources
The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups
Memory, 2007Recent guidelines in the US allow either simultaneous or sequential lineups to be used for eyewitness identification. This paper investigates how potential jurors weight the probative value of the different outcomes from both of these types of lineups.
Daniel B Wright
exaly +3 more sources
The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups.
Law and Human Behavior, 2005A theoretical cornerstone in eyewitness identification research is the proposition that witnesses, in making decisions from standard simultaneous lineups, make relative judgments. The present research considers two sources of support for this proposal. An experiment by G. L.
Steven E, Clark, Sherrie L, Davey
openaire +2 more sources
Law and Human Behavior, 1997
Two experiments were conducted comparing the identification accuracy of children aged 3–15 years (N = 307) and undergraduates (N = 384) using target-present and target-absent simultaneous and sequential lineups and showups. Correct identification rates tended not to vary across either age of subject or identification procedure. However, children show a
R C L Lindsay +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Two experiments were conducted comparing the identification accuracy of children aged 3–15 years (N = 307) and undergraduates (N = 384) using target-present and target-absent simultaneous and sequential lineups and showups. Correct identification rates tended not to vary across either age of subject or identification procedure. However, children show a
R C L Lindsay +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
Law and Human Behavior, 2011Police practice of double-blind sequential lineups prompts a question about the efficacy of repeated viewings (laps) of the sequential lineup. Two laboratory experiments confirmed the presence of a sequential lap effect: an increase in witness lineup picks from first to second lap, when the culprit was a stranger.
Nancy K, Steblay +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Much better than the sequential lineup: a 120-person lineup
Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012Abstract Large lineups may be more reliable than small ones. However, research has found greatly reduced identifications in 40-person lineups of photos shown sequentially one at a time. The task may be more difficult than necessary. Grouping photos may provide an easier one.
openaire +1 more source
Sequential Lineups: Shift in Criterion or Decision Strategy?
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004R. C. L. Lindsay and G. L. Wells (1985) argued that a sequential lineup enhanced discriminability because it elicited use of an absolute decision strategy. E. B. Ebbesen and H. D. Flowe (2002) argued that a sequential lineup led witnesses to adopt a more conservative response criterion, thereby affecting bias, not discriminability.
openaire +2 more sources
The not‐sure response option in sequential lineup practice
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2010AbstractField implementation of double‐blind sequential lineups has prompted a question about the impact on eyewitness decisions of an explicit not‐sure response option. In this laboratory study, a video crime was viewed by 378 participants who then attempted to identify the culprit from a six‐person sequential or simultaneous‐format lineup that either
Nancy K. Steblay, Jonathan D. Phillips
openaire +1 more source
Unravelling the effects of sequential presentation in culprit-present lineups
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2003AbstractIt is well established that sequential presentation of faces in an eyewitness situation can reduce false identification rates. The effect of a sequential presentation on the probability of accurately identifying a culprit when present in a lineup is less clear.
Amina Memon, Fiona Gabbert
exaly +2 more sources