Lineup position affects guessing-based selection but not culprit-presence detection in simultaneous and sequential lineups [PDF]
The two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was applied to investigate the effects of lineup position on the latent cognitive processes underlying eyewitness responses in lineups.
Carolin Mayer +3 more
doaj +5 more sources
On the advantages of using AI-generated images of filler faces for creating fair lineups [PDF]
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) enable the generation of realistic facial images that can be used in police lineups. The use of AI image generation offers pragmatic advantages in that it allows practitioners to generate filler images ...
Raoul Bell +3 more
doaj +3 more sources
The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions [PDF]
Here we apply the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model to identify the effects of lineup size on the detection-based and non-detection-based processes underlying eyewitness decisions.
Nicola Marie Menne +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model [PDF]
The mock-witness task is typically used to evaluate the fairness of lineups. However, the validity of this task has been questioned because there are substantial differences between the tasks for mock witnesses and eyewitnesses. Unlike eyewitnesses, mock
Nicola Marie Menne +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Detection of culprit presence in multiple-culprit crimes: A comparison of combined and separate lineup-presentation formats. [PDF]
Although crimes involving multiple culprits are widespread, there is still a lack of understanding of how the police should construct lineups for multiple suspects in these cases.
Ulla Lichtenhagen +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Suspect identification accuracy from lineups, in the lab and in the field [PDF]
A 2016 field study conducted in collaboration with the Houston Police Department reported that simultaneous lineups were diagnostically superior to sequential lineups, that confidence was strongly predictive of accuracy, and that high-confidence suspect ...
John T. Wixted, Laura Mickes
doaj +2 more sources
Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability? [PDF]
Debate regarding the best way to test and measure eyewitness memory has dominated the eyewitness literature for more than 30 years. We argue that resolution of this debate requires the development and application of appropriate measurement models.
Matthew Kaesler +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Delays reduce culprit-presence detection but do not affect guessing-based selection in response to lineups [PDF]
Police lineups are conducted with varying delays between the crime and the lineup. Crime-to-lineup delays may adversely affect the detection of the presence and absence of the culprit in the lineup and may potentially affect guessing-based selection.
Amelie Therre +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. [PDF]
Staged crime research has demonstrated the utility of controlling the conduct of lineups as a means of reducing false identifications with little or no apparent decline in the rate of correct identifications by eyewitnesses (e.g., Lindsay & Wells, 1980; Malpass & Devine, 1981a; Wells, 1984).
R C Lindsay, Gary L Wells
exaly +2 more sources
Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists [PDF]
Recent research in the eyewitness identification literature has investigated whether simultaneous or sequential lineups yield better discriminability. In standard eyewitness identification experiments, subjects view a mock-crime video and then are tested only once, requiring large samples for adequate power.
John T Wixted, , Wixted John T
exaly +3 more sources

