Results 101 to 110 of about 209 (131)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Exploring the sequential lineup advantage using WITNESS.
Law and Human Behavior, 2010Advocates claim that the sequential lineup is an improvement over simultaneous lineup procedures, but no formal (quantitatively specified) explanation exists for why it is better. The computational model WITNESS (Clark, Appl Cogn Psychol 17:629-654, 2003) was used to develop theoretical explanations for the sequential lineup advantage.
Charles A, Goodsell +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2001AbstractThe cognitive processes and decision‐making strategies of eyewitnesses were tested for their predictive qualities in determining the accuracy of identifications from lineups. The sequential lineup presentation was compared with the traditionally employed simultaneous lineup under culprit (target) present and culprit absent conditions ...
Wendy Kneller +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006Many states and communities are rewriting their eyewitness identification policies. Some of these jurisdictions are excluding simultaneous lineups altogether, and others are allowing them if double-blind administration of sequential lineups is not possible.
openaire +1 more source
PC_Eyewitness and the Sequential Superiority Effect: Computer-Based Lineup Administration.
Law and Human Behavior, 2005Computer technology has become an increasingly important tool for conducting eyewitness identifications. In the area of lineup identifications, computerized administration offers several advantages for researchers and law enforcement. PC_Eyewitness is designed specifically to administer lineups.
MacLin, O. H. +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2012
Although the sequential lineup has been proposed as a means of protecting innocent suspects from mistaken identification, little is known about the importance of various aspects of the procedure. One potentially important detail is that witnesses should not know how many people are in the lineup.
Ruth Horry +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Although the sequential lineup has been proposed as a means of protecting innocent suspects from mistaken identification, little is known about the importance of various aspects of the procedure. One potentially important detail is that witnesses should not know how many people are in the lineup.
Ruth Horry +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Simultaneous, Sequential, Elimination, and Wildcard: A Comparison of Lineup Procedures
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2015This study compared four lineup procedures: the simultaneous, sequential, elimination, and wildcard. Two hundred and sixty-nine university students (M = 20.17 years) watched a mock, videotaped crime. Then, following a brief delay, they viewed a 6-person target-present or -absent lineup using one of the four lineup procedures. For target-present lineups,
Joanna D. Pozzulo +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Diagnostic Feature Detection and Sequential Eyewitness Lineups
2023Prior work has demonstrated that the sequential presentation of lineup members in eyewitness lineups can result in undesirable position effects. For example, some studies have shown that placing the suspect in later positions increases discriminability.
openaire +2 more sources
Law and Human Behavior, 2015
Eyewitnesses (494) to actual crimes in 4 police jurisdictions were randomly assigned to view simultaneous or sequential photo lineups using laptop computers and double-blind administration. The sequential procedure used in the field experiment mimicked how it is conducted in actual practice (e.g., using a continuation rule, witness does not know how ...
Gary L, Wells +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Eyewitnesses (494) to actual crimes in 4 police jurisdictions were randomly assigned to view simultaneous or sequential photo lineups using laptop computers and double-blind administration. The sequential procedure used in the field experiment mimicked how it is conducted in actual practice (e.g., using a continuation rule, witness does not know how ...
Gary L, Wells +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2013
Confidence judgments for eyewitness identifications play an integral role in determining guilt during legal proceedings. Past research has shown that confidence in positive identifications is strongly associated with accuracy. Using a standard lineup recognition paradigm, we investigated accuracy using signal detection and ROC analyses, along with the ...
David G, Dobolyi, Chad S, Dodson
openaire +2 more sources
Confidence judgments for eyewitness identifications play an integral role in determining guilt during legal proceedings. Past research has shown that confidence in positive identifications is strongly associated with accuracy. Using a standard lineup recognition paradigm, we investigated accuracy using signal detection and ROC analyses, along with the ...
David G, Dobolyi, Chad S, Dodson
openaire +2 more sources
Sequential lineup advantage: contributions of distinctiveness and recollection
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2005One procedural safeguard that may improve the reliability of eyewitness identification is a sequential lineup. A sequential lineup (view lineup members one at a time) is thought to be superior to a simultaneous lineup (view all lineup members at the same time) because the sequential lineup appears to make it less likely that a witness will choose ...
openaire +1 more source