Results 111 to 120 of about 209 (131)

Can a Lineup Procedure Designed for Child Witnesses Work for Adults? Comparing Simultaneous, Sequential, and Elimination Lineup Procedures

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008
A study (N = 165) was conducted to examine whether the elimination lineup, an identification procedure developed for children to reduce their false‐positive responding, was effective for adult witnesses. Although the sequential lineup is available to help reduce adults’ false‐positive identifications, having different procedures for child and adult ...
Joanna D. Pozzulo, Julie Dempsey, Shevaun Corey, Alberta Girardi, Alex Lawandi, Cory Aston   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Attempts to Improve Children's Identifications From Sequential‐Presentation Lineups

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2001
The effectiveness of practice and stringent lineup instructions in improving children's identifications from sequential‐presentation lineups was investigated. Elementary school children (N= 144) viewed a slide sequence of a crime followed by practice or control procedures.
Janat Fraser Parker, Amber Myers
openaire   +1 more source

Clarifying the effects of sequential item presentation in the police lineup task

Cognition
Previous research has reported diverging patterns of results with respect to discriminability and response bias when comparing the simultaneous lineup to two different lineup procedures in which items are presented sequentially, the sequential stopping rule lineup and the UK lineup.
Matthew, Kaesler, John C, Dunn, Carolyn, Semmler   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Hits, Misses, and False Alarms in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
Studies indicate that sequential lineups decrease the rate of false alarms at the cost of increasing the rate of lost hits. This paper discusses how policymakers should assess this data, considering measures of probative value and the preference for false acquittals over false convictions.
openaire   +1 more source

Protecting innocent defendants, nailing the guilty: a modified sequential lineup

Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1998
Can the traditional lineup procedure be modified in such a way as to still secure positive identifications of guilty persons while minimizing the risk of misidentifications? Witnesses interacted with a ‘culprit’ who they were later called upon to identify from a 20-person sequential video lineup.
openaire   +1 more source

Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
Rod C. Lindsay, James A. Lea, Jennifer A. Fulford   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of suspect identifications made by actual eyewitnesses from simultaneous and sequential lineups in a randomized field trial

Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2014
Karen L Amendola, John T Wixted, Wixted John T   +2 more
exaly  

Evidence of differential performance on simultaneous and sequential lineups for individuals with autism-spectrum traits

Personality and Individual Differences, 2011
Matthew H Scullin, Christian A Meissner
exaly  

The flaw in Amendola and Wixted’s conclusion on simultaneous versus sequential lineups

Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015
Gary L Wells, Nancy K Steblay
exaly  

Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016
John T Wixted, Laura Mickes, John C Dunn   +2 more
exaly