Results 101 to 110 of about 363 (140)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009
Preschoolers' (3- to 6-year-olds) person description and identification abilities were examined using the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Participants (N = 100) were exposed to a 20-minute mask-making session conducted by a female confederate who acted as the mask-making teacher.
Joanna D Pozzulo
exaly +2 more sources
Preschoolers' (3- to 6-year-olds) person description and identification abilities were examined using the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Participants (N = 100) were exposed to a 20-minute mask-making session conducted by a female confederate who acted as the mask-making teacher.
Joanna D Pozzulo
exaly +2 more sources
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
SummaryAccording to the Diagnostic Feature‐Detection (DFD) hypothesis, the presence of fillers that match the eyewitness's description of the perpetrator will boost discriminability beyond a showup, and very few fillers may suffice to produce the advantage. We tested this hypothesis by comparing showups with simultaneous lineups of size 3, 6, 9, and 12.
Alex R Wooten +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
SummaryAccording to the Diagnostic Feature‐Detection (DFD) hypothesis, the presence of fillers that match the eyewitness's description of the perpetrator will boost discriminability beyond a showup, and very few fillers may suffice to produce the advantage. We tested this hypothesis by comparing showups with simultaneous lineups of size 3, 6, 9, and 12.
Alex R Wooten +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Applied Cognitive Psychology
AbstractIn recent years, the use of calibration analysis and confidence‐accuracy characteristic analysis has revealed the confidence‐accuracy relationship for positive identification (ID) made from a lineup is often strong. At the same time, the confidence‐accuracy relationship for lineup rejections is typically much weaker.
Anne S Yilmaz, John T Wixted
exaly +2 more sources
AbstractIn recent years, the use of calibration analysis and confidence‐accuracy characteristic analysis has revealed the confidence‐accuracy relationship for positive identification (ID) made from a lineup is often strong. At the same time, the confidence‐accuracy relationship for lineup rejections is typically much weaker.
Anne S Yilmaz, John T Wixted
exaly +2 more sources
Law and Human Behavior, 2015
Eyewitnesses (494) to actual crimes in 4 police jurisdictions were randomly assigned to view simultaneous or sequential photo lineups using laptop computers and double-blind administration. The sequential procedure used in the field experiment mimicked how it is conducted in actual practice (e.g., using a continuation rule, witness does not know how ...
Gary L, Wells +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Eyewitnesses (494) to actual crimes in 4 police jurisdictions were randomly assigned to view simultaneous or sequential photo lineups using laptop computers and double-blind administration. The sequential procedure used in the field experiment mimicked how it is conducted in actual practice (e.g., using a continuation rule, witness does not know how ...
Gary L, Wells +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2001AbstractThe cognitive processes and decision‐making strategies of eyewitnesses were tested for their predictive qualities in determining the accuracy of identifications from lineups. The sequential lineup presentation was compared with the traditionally employed simultaneous lineup under culprit (target) present and culprit absent conditions ...
Kneller, Wendy +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
The flaw in Amendola and Wixted’s conclusion on simultaneous versus sequential lineups
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015Objective Our objective was to examine how Amendola and Wixted (A&W, 2014) arrived at their conclusion that eyewitness identifications of suspects from simultaneous lineups were supported better by corroborating evidence than were identifications from sequential lineups. Their cases came from a randomized field experiment by Wells et al. (2014).
Gary L. Wells +2 more
openaire +1 more source
A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006Many states and communities are rewriting their eyewitness identification policies. Some of these jurisdictions are excluding simultaneous lineups altogether, and others are allowing them if double-blind administration of sequential lineups is not possible.
openaire +1 more source
Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006A considerable amount of empirical research has been conducted on ways to improve the eyewitness identification process, with emphasis on the use of lineups. Public policy changes are currently underway with respect to lineup procedures: Sequential lineups are being recommended to police as the best practice.
McQuiston-Surrett, D. E. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Law and Human Behavior, 2001
Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior
N, Steblay +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior
N, Steblay +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups
Memory, 2007Recent guidelines in the US allow either simultaneous or sequential lineups to be used for eyewitness identification. This paper investigates how potential jurors weight the probative value of the different outcomes from both of these types of lineups.
openaire +2 more sources