Results 121 to 130 of about 3,138,207 (166)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Response bias modulates the confidence-accuracy relationship for both positive identifications and lineup rejections in a simultaneous lineup task

Applied Cognitive Psychology
In recent years, the use of calibration analysis and confidence‐accuracy characteristic analysis has revealed the confidence‐accuracy relationship for positive identification (ID) made from a lineup is often strong.
John Wixted, Anne Yilmaz
exaly   +3 more sources

Simultaneous, Sequential, Elimination, and Wildcard: A Comparison of Lineup Procedures

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2015
This study compared four lineup procedures: the simultaneous, sequential, elimination, and wildcard. Two hundred and sixty-nine university students (M = 20.17 years) watched a mock, videotaped crime. Then, following a brief delay, they viewed a 6-person target-present or -absent lineup using one of the four lineup procedures. For target-present lineups,
Joanna Pozzulo
exaly   +3 more sources

The number of fillers may not matter as long as they all match the description: The effect of simultaneous lineup size on eyewitness identification

Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
SummaryAccording to the Diagnostic Feature‐Detection (DFD) hypothesis, the presence of fillers that match the eyewitness's description of the perpetrator will boost discriminability beyond a showup, and very few fillers may suffice to produce the advantage. We tested this hypothesis by comparing showups with simultaneous lineups of size 3, 6, 9, and 12.
Alyssa Jones   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Applied Psychology, 1985
Staged crime research has demonstrated the utility of controlling the conduct of lineups as a means of reducing false identifications with little or no apparent decline in the rate of correct identifications by eyewitnesses (e.g., Lindsay & Wells, 1980; Malpass & Devine, 1981a; Wells, 1984).
Gary L Wells, R C Lindsay
exaly   +3 more sources

Can a Lineup Procedure Designed for Child Witnesses Work for Adults? Comparing Simultaneous, Sequential, and Elimination Lineup Procedures

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008
A study (N = 165) was conducted to examine whether the elimination lineup, an identification procedure developed for children to reduce their false‐positive responding, was effective for adult witnesses. Although the sequential lineup is available to help reduce adults’ false‐positive identifications, having different procedures for child and adult ...
Joanna Pozzulo
exaly   +3 more sources

Preschoolers' person description and identification accuracy: A comparison of the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009
Preschoolers' (3- to 6-year-olds) person description and identification abilities were examined using the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Participants (N = 100) were exposed to a 20-minute mask-making session conducted by a female confederate who acted as the mask-making teacher.
Joanna Pozzulo
exaly   +3 more sources

Testing a new lineup procedure with children: The elimination with wildcard

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2020
Preschoolers' (4- to 7-year-olds) recall and correct rejection rates using the simultaneous, wildcard, elimination, and a new lineup; the elimination with wildcard were compared. The new lineup uses the traditional two judgement procedure inherent to the
Bailey Fraser   +2 more
exaly   +2 more sources

Children's and adults' eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures

Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2006
Adults' ( N = 239) and children's ( N = 177, age range 8–13 years) identification abilities were examined when a culprit underwent a change in appearance following the commission of a crime.
Joanna Pozzulo
exaly   +3 more sources

Thinking outside the red box: Does the simultaneous Showup distinguish between filler siphoning and diagnostic feature detection accounts of lineup/Showup differences?

Cognition
Lineups are considered a superior method of identification to showups, but why is contested. There are two main theories: diagnostic feature detection theory, which holds that surrounding the suspect with fillers causes the eyewitness to focus on the ...
Amber M Giacona   +4 more
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.

Law and Human Behavior, 2015
Eyewitnesses (494) to actual crimes in 4 police jurisdictions were randomly assigned to view simultaneous or sequential photo lineups using laptop computers and double-blind administration. The sequential procedure used in the field experiment mimicked how it is conducted in actual practice (e.g., using a continuation rule, witness does not know how ...
Gary L. Wells   +2 more
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy