Results 131 to 140 of about 3,138,207 (166)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Law and Human Behavior, 2001
Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior
N. Steblay +3 more
semanticscholar +3 more sources
Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior
N. Steblay +3 more
semanticscholar +3 more sources
The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups.
Law and Human Behavior, 2005A theoretical cornerstone in eyewitness identification research is the proposition that witnesses, in making decisions from standard simultaneous lineups, make relative judgments. The present research considers two sources of support for this proposal. An experiment by G. L.
Steven E, Clark, Sherrie L, Davey
openaire +2 more sources
Cognition, 2022
Matching identity in images of unfamiliar faces is difficult: Images of the same person can look different and images of different people can look similar.
K. A. Baker, V. J. Stabile, C. Mondloch
semanticscholar +1 more source
Matching identity in images of unfamiliar faces is difficult: Images of the same person can look different and images of different people can look similar.
K. A. Baker, V. J. Stabile, C. Mondloch
semanticscholar +1 more source
Law and Human Behavior, 1997
Two experiments were conducted comparing the identification accuracy of children aged 3–15 years (N = 307) and undergraduates (N = 384) using target-present and target-absent simultaneous and sequential lineups and showups. Correct identification rates tended not to vary across either age of subject or identification procedure. However, children show a
R. C. L. Lindsay +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Two experiments were conducted comparing the identification accuracy of children aged 3–15 years (N = 307) and undergraduates (N = 384) using target-present and target-absent simultaneous and sequential lineups and showups. Correct identification rates tended not to vary across either age of subject or identification procedure. However, children show a
R. C. L. Lindsay +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Sequential vs. Simultaneous Lineups: A Review of Methods, Data, and Theory.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006A considerable amount of empirical research has been conducted on ways to improve the eyewitness identification process, with emphasis on the use of lineups. Public policy changes are currently underway with respect to lineup procedures: Sequential lineups are being recommended to police as the best practice.
McQuiston-Surrett, D. E. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
The flaw in Amendola and Wixted’s conclusion on simultaneous versus sequential lineups
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015Objective Our objective was to examine how Amendola and Wixted (A&W, 2014) arrived at their conclusion that eyewitness identifications of suspects from simultaneous lineups were supported better by corroborating evidence than were identifications from sequential lineups. Their cases came from a randomized field experiment by Wells et al. (2014).
Gary L. Wells +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Memory, 2018
For decades, sequential lineups have been considered superior to simultaneous lineups in the context of eyewitness identification. However, most of the research leading to this conclusion was based on the analysis of diagnosticity ratios that do not control for the respondent's response criterion. Recent research based on the analysis of ROC curves has
Julia Meisters +2 more
semanticscholar +3 more sources
For decades, sequential lineups have been considered superior to simultaneous lineups in the context of eyewitness identification. However, most of the research leading to this conclusion was based on the analysis of diagnosticity ratios that do not control for the respondent's response criterion. Recent research based on the analysis of ROC curves has
Julia Meisters +2 more
semanticscholar +3 more sources
A policy evaluation of simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2006Many states and communities are rewriting their eyewitness identification policies. Some of these jurisdictions are excluding simultaneous lineups altogether, and others are allowing them if double-blind administration of sequential lineups is not possible.
openaire +1 more source
Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2001AbstractThe cognitive processes and decision‐making strategies of eyewitnesses were tested for their predictive qualities in determining the accuracy of identifications from lineups. The sequential lineup presentation was compared with the traditionally employed simultaneous lineup under culprit (target) present and culprit absent conditions ...
Kneller, Wendy +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups
Memory, 2007Recent guidelines in the US allow either simultaneous or sequential lineups to be used for eyewitness identification. This paper investigates how potential jurors weight the probative value of the different outcomes from both of these types of lineups.
openaire +2 more sources