pyWitness 1.0: A python eyewitness identification analysis toolkit. [PDF]
Behav Res MethodsMickes L +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
The role of experimenter familiarity in children's eyewitness identification. [PDF]
Psychiatr Psychol LawCalderwood L, Ballantyne C, Slee K.
europepmc +1 more source
Does the Forensic Filler-Control Method Reduce Examiner Overconfidence? An Experimental Investigation Using Mock Fingerprint Examiners. [PDF]
Behav Sci (Basel)Rath HJ, Rocha B, Smith AM, Smalarz L.
europepmc +1 more source
The effects of target discriminability and criterion placement on accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous target-present lineups [PDF]
Psychology, Crime and Law, 2011 Participants attempted to select previously studied faces from lineups that were administered either sequentially (test faces presented one at a time) or simultaneously (test faces presented altogether). Target discriminability was manipulated by varying
Heather D Flowe
exaly +11 more sources
Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. [PDF]
Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985 Staged crime research has demonstrated the utility of controlling the conduct of lineups as a means of reducing false identifications with little or no apparent decline in the rate of correct identifications by eyewitnesses (e.g., Lindsay & Wells, 1980; Malpass & Devine, 1981a; Wells, 1984).
Gary L Wells, R C Lindsay
exaly +2 more sources
Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists [PDF]
Memory and Cognition, 2020 Recent research in the eyewitness identification literature has investigated whether simultaneous or sequential lineups yield better discriminability. In standard eyewitness identification experiments, subjects view a mock-crime video and then are tested only once, requiring large samples for adequate power.
John Wixted
exaly +3 more sources
Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups [PDF]
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016 In contrast to prior research, recent studies of simulated crimes have reported that (i) eyewitness confidence can be a strong indicator of accuracy and (ii) traditional simultaneous lineups may be diagnostically superior to sequential lineups.
John Wixted, John Dunn, Laura Mickes
exaly +2 more sources
Related searches:
Two experiments were conducted comparing the identification accuracy of children aged 3–15 years (N = 307) and undergraduates (N = 384) using target-present and target-absent simultaneous and sequential lineups and showups. Correct identification rates tended not to vary across either age of subject or identification procedure. However, children show a
Kang Lee, Wendy Craig, Joanna Pozzulo
exaly +2 more sources
The flaw in Amendola and Wixted’s conclusion on simultaneous versus sequential lineups
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015Objective Our objective was to examine how Amendola and Wixted (A&W, 2014) arrived at their conclusion that eyewitness identifications of suspects from simultaneous lineups were supported better by corroborating evidence than were identifications from sequential lineups. Their cases came from a randomized field experiment by Wells et al. (2014).
Gary L Wells
exaly +2 more sources
The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups.
Law and Human Behavior, 2005A theoretical cornerstone in eyewitness identification research is the proposition that witnesses, in making decisions from standard simultaneous lineups, make relative judgments. The present research considers two sources of support for this proposal. An experiment by G. L.
Steven E, Clark, Sherrie L, Davey
openaire +2 more sources