Results 21 to 30 of about 268 (140)

EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING SKEPTICAL THEISM

open access: bronzeFaith and Philosophy, 2008
Trent Dougherty   +1 more
openalex   +3 more sources

SKEPTICAL THEISM AND EMPIRICAL UNFALSIFIABILITY

open access: bronzeFaith and Philosophy, 2009
Ian Wilks   +1 more
openalex   +3 more sources

Evil Prevention Requirements and the God of Theism

open access: yesReligions, 2022
The central argument of James Sterba’s “Is a Good God Logically Possible?” relies crucially on the notion that a good God would have to abide by various evil prevention requirements.
Adam Noel Wood
doaj   +1 more source

THE DE JURE OBJECTION AGAINST BELIEF IN MIRACLES

open access: yesManuscrito, 2021
Alvin Plantinga (1993a, 1993b, 2000) argues that de jure objections to theism depend on de facto objections: in order to say that belief in God is not warranted, one should first assume that this belief is false. Assuming Plantinga’s epistemology and his
GESIEL DA SILVA
doaj   +1 more source

Is There a Right to Hope That God Exists? Evil and the Principle of Non-Parity

open access: yesReligions, 2022
In this paper, I respond to James Sterba’s recent book ‘Is a Good God Logically Possible?’ I show that Sterba concludes that God is not logically possible by ignoring three important issues: (a) the different functions of leeway indeterminism (and the ...
Jacqueline Mariña
doaj   +1 more source

Epistemological Considerations Concerning Skeptical Theism

open access: greenFaith and Philosophy, 2011
Jonathan Matheson   +1 more
openalex   +3 more sources

In Answer to the Pauline Principle: Consent, Logical Constraints, and Free Will

open access: yesReligions, 2022
James Sterba uses the Pauline Principle to argue that the occurrence of significant, horrendous evils is logically incompatible with the existence of a good God.
Marilie Coetsee
doaj   +1 more source

A Dilemma for Sterba

open access: yesReligions, 2022
James Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible. He argues that what he calls the Pauline Principle, which says that we should never do evil that good may come of it, implies that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of ...
Bruce Russell
doaj   +1 more source

CORNEA under magnifier: an assessment of usability of CORNEA against William Rowe’s evidential argument from gratuitous evil [PDF]

open access: yesحکمت معاصر, 2018
By introducing evidential argument, William Rowe opened a new chapter in discussions about problem of evil. Rowe’s first formulation of the problem based on the idea that because “it appears” that some evils in the world are gratuitous then they are ...
mohammad ali mirbagheri   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

A New Interpretation of the Theory of Evolution and its Compatibility with Intelligent Design Based on Peter Van Inwagen’s View [PDF]

open access: yesComparative Theology, 2018
This study aims to present a new interpretation of the theory of evolution and its compatibility with intelligent design based on special views of Peter van Inwagen.
Farah Ramin, Tayebe Gholami
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy