Results 151 to 160 of about 4,329,351 (193)

False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry [PDF]

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022
To analyze the relationship between rates of false positive (FP) responses and standard automated perimetry results.Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.One hundred twenty-six patients with manifest or suspect glaucoma were tested with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster at each of 2 visits ...
Aiko Iwase, Vincent Michael Patella
exaly   +6 more sources

Repeatability of Automated Perimetry: A Comparison between Standard Automated Perimetry with Stimulus Size III and V, Matrix, and Motion Perimetry

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2009
Standard automated perimetry (SAP) shows a marked increase in variability in damaged areas of the visual field. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that larger stimuli are associated with more uniform variability, by investigating the retest variability of four perimetry tests: standard automated perimetry size III (SAP III), with the SITA ...
Michael Wall, Paul H Artes
exaly   +3 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Current Practice with Standard Automated Perimetry

Seminars in Ophthalmology, 2000
This article reviews standard visual field testing. The authors discuss the psychophysics involved in the design of the perimeter and the parameters used to test visual field sensitivity. The authors also explain normal and pathological sensitivity across the visual field, the patient and testing conditions that influence visual field results, and the ...
C F, Bosworth, P A, Sample, C A, Johnson, R N, Weinreb   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients

Current Eye Research, 2017
This prospective observational study compared the performance of size modulation standard automated perimetry with the Octopus 600 10-2 test program, with stimulus size modulation during testing, based on stimulus intensity and conventional standard automated perimetry, with that of the Humphrey 10-2 test program in glaucoma patients.Eighty-seven eyes ...
Kazunori Hirasawa, Tsukasa Satou, Nobuyuki Shoji   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in migraine

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2005
Abstract The literature suggests that visual field defects may be more common in people who experience migraine. The Humphrey frequency doubling (FDT) visual field instrument selectively examines the magnocellular visual pathway, but has not previously been used to investigate visual function in migraine.
Deacon E, Harle, Bruce J W, Evans
openaire   +2 more sources

Rarebit Perimetry for Bedside Testing: Comparison With Standard Automated Perimetry

Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 2010
Rarebit perimetry (RBP), a technique developed for the detection of early damage to the afferent visual system, has not been extensively tested at the bedside. This study was designed to test the feasibility of bedside testing with RBP in comparison with standard automated perimetry (SAP) performed in the clinic.We tested 29 eyes of 15 subjects ...
Samuel K, Steven Houston, Eric D, Weber, Sebastian F, Koga, Steven A, Newman   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Relationship between HEP perimetry and standard automated perimetry

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2010
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the relationship between Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) performed with Humphrey perimeter (Carl Zeiss Meditec, EEUU) and a new white‐white perimetry tested with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP, Heidelberg Engineering, Alemania).
L GIL ARRIBAS, P CALVO, A FERRERAS, I ALTEMIR, S OTIN, S FERNANDEZ, L PABLO JULVEZ, I FUERTES   +7 more
openaire   +1 more source

Comparison of High-pass Resolution Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995
We sought to ascertain whether high-pass resolution perimetry would provide results comparable to those of standard perimetry.Thirty-four eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma, 37 eyes suspected of having glaucoma, and 36 normal control eyes were matched for age and lens density. We controlled for refraction, pupil size, and learning effects.
G A, Martinez, P A, Sample, R N, Weinreb
openaire   +2 more sources

Reading a standard automated perimetry printout

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2022
AbstractInterpreting the results of standard automated perimetry (SAP) is not difficult but a systematic approach is pivotal. In this part of the course we address the following topics: Which test to choose in which situation? Is the test reliable? What are common artefacts and how do you recognize them?
openaire   +1 more source