Fighting Organizational Degeneration Through a Right to Strike in Democratic Corporations
Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
Philipp Stehr
wiley +1 more source
Weaponizing Kinship: A Demographic Analysis of Bereavement in the Colombian Conflict
Abstract The ongoing Colombian armed conflict has produced widespread homicides and enforced disappearances, as armed actors used violence to terrorize communities and consolidate power. Family bereavement—one of the most pervasive and enduring consequences of this violence—remains critically understudied from a quantitative perspective.
Enrique Acosta +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Whose voice is heard? Mental health professionals' involvement, epistemic injustice, and the ethics of psychiatric advance directives. [PDF]
Quenum Y.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT I defend the non‐instrumentalist thesis that every adult member of a political society has a pro tanto fundamental moral right to an equal democratic say in determining the content of the laws to which she is subject. I begin by giving an account of an important kind of servility that has received only glancing notice in philosophical ...
Shruta Swarup
wiley +1 more source
I'm still here and my opinion matters: a scoping review on the experience of epistemic injustice among people living with dementia. [PDF]
Calabrese L +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Prejudicial stereotypes and testimonial injustice: Autism, sexuality and sex education
Alison MacKenzie
openalex +2 more sources
Bullshitters, Liars and Bad Teachers: The Scope of Epistemic Malevolence
ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is two‐fold. We argue against the received conception of epistemic malevolence and give a broader characterisation that, we argue, captures its real scope. We tackle the current notion of epistemic malevolence (EM) on three fronts. We claim that this notion fails to capture cases of EM that are (i) not knowledge directed (
Sam Dickson +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Justice in priority-setting for research on health and climate change. [PDF]
Bhaumik S.
europepmc +1 more source
Argumentatively Navigating Deep Disagreements
ABSTRACT When disagreements cut deep, epistemic agents face a predicament. Although disagreements have been widely hailed for their epistemic benefits, deep disagreements are often plagued with argumentative hurdles preventing the attainment of such epistemic goods.
Jordi Fairhurst
wiley +1 more source
Epistemic disadvantage and looping breaks: a reply to Gauld et al. [PDF]
Alcalay R.
europepmc +1 more source

