Results 251 to 260 of about 18,942 (292)

Responsibility for testimonial injustice

Philosophical Studies, 2020
In this paper, I examine whether agents who commit testimonial injustice are morally responsible for their wrongdoing, given that they are ignorant of their wrongdoing. Fricker (Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007) argues that agents whose social setting lacks the concepts or reasons necessary for
Adam Piovarchy
openaire   +3 more sources

Testifying Bodies: Testimonial Injustice as Derivatization

Social Epistemology, 2019
Human beings as objects, and we are objects inter alia, offer information, even knowledge. And yet, in a society marked by pervasive identity prejudice, even objects do not offer neutral facts.
Carolyn Cusick
openaire   +3 more sources

Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning

Journal of Medical Ethics, 2023
Machine learning (ML) systems play an increasingly relevant role in medicine and healthcare. As their applications move ever closer to patient care and cure in clinical settings, ethical concerns about the responsibility of their use come to the fore.
openaire   +4 more sources

Criminal Testimonial Injustice

2023
Abstract Through a detailed analysis that draws on work across philosophy, the law, and social psychology, this book shows that, from the very beginning of the American criminal legal process in interrogation rooms to its final stages in front of parole boards, testimony is extracted from individuals through processes that are coercive ...
openaire   +1 more source

#MeToo and testimonial injustice

2021
Two decades ago, Tarana Burke started using the phrase ‘me too’ to release victims of sexual abuse and rape from their shame and to empower girls from minority communities. In 2017, actress Alyssa Milano made the hashtag #MeToo go viral. This article’s concern is with the role of testimonial practices in the context of sexual violence.
openaire   +2 more sources

Children, credibility, and testimonial injustice

Journal of Social Philosophy, 2021
According to Miranda Fricker (2007), a person suffers testimonial injustice when they suffer a wrongful credibility deficit—that is, when their assertions are met with undue skepticism. As yet, there is no discussion of testimonial injustice against the elderly. There is, however, an emerging discussion of testimonial injustice against children. That
openaire   +2 more sources

Testimonial Injustice and Mindreading

Hypatia, 2016
Miranda Fricker maintains that testimonial responsibility is the proper corrective to testimonial injustice. She proposes a perceptual‐like “testimonial sensibility” to explain the transmission of knowledge through testimony. This sensibility is the means by which a hearer perceives an interlocutor's credibility level. When prejudice causes a hearer to
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy