Results 261 to 270 of about 18,942 (292)

Credibility and Testimonial Injustice

2023
Abstract One of the core components of the concept of agential testimonial injustice developed throughout this book is that speakers are given an excess of credibility, so it is helpful to have a sense of what a sufficient amount of credibility involves.
openaire   +1 more source

Testimonial Injustice and Teacher Education

Action in Teacher Education, 2020
This narrative inquiry explores the experiences of LGBTQ+ teacher candidates of color in a teacher education program. Composed of vignettes written by teacher candidates and narrative analysis to frame the significance of and contexts within which the vignettes were written, this study first offers insight into the ways teacher candidates understand ...
openaire   +1 more source

Testimonial Injustice

2007
Abstract This chapter formulates a working definition of social power, and identifies and defines a sub-type — identity power. The first kind of epistemic injustice is explored: testimonial injustice, wherein a speaker receives an unfair deficit of credibility from a hearer owing to prejudice on the hearer's part.
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemic Degradation and Testimonial Injustice

2021
Abstract In this chapter, Geoff Pynn asks what is the nature of the wrong involved in cases of testimonial injustice. After raising problems for accounts that explain the wrong in terms of objectification, where speakers are treated as mere sources of information rather than as informants, and in terms of derivatization, where speakers ...
openaire   +1 more source

Testimonial Injustice and Trust

Testimonial Injustice and Trust, 2023
Altanian, Melanie, Baghramian, Maria
openaire   +2 more sources

Testimonial Withdrawal and The Ontology of Testimonial Injustice

Southwest Philosophy Review
Concepts like testimonial injustice (Fricker, 2007) and testimonial violence (Dotson, 2011) articulate that marginalized epistemic agents are unjustly undermined as testifiers when dominant agents cannot or will not hear, understand, or believe their testimony.
openaire   +1 more source

Testimonial injustice and prescriptive credibility deficits

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2016
AbstractIn light of recent social psychological literature, I expand Miranda Fricker’s important notion of testimonial injustice. A fair portion of Fricker’s account rests on an older paradigm of stereotype and prejudice. Given recent empirical work, I argue for what I dub prescriptive credibility deficits in which a backlash effect leads to the ...
openaire   +1 more source

False Confessions and Agential Testimonial Injustice

2023
Abstract This chapter examines confessions, which have long been regarded in the criminal legal system as the ‘gold standard’ in evidence. Despite this, interrogators in the United States systematically use tactics that are manipulative, deceptive, and coercive, leaving suspects desperate, confused, vulnerable, and ultimately willing to ...
openaire   +1 more source

Silencing by Not Telling: Testimonial Void as a New Kind of Testimonial Injustice

Social Epistemology, 2021
Carla Carmona Escalera
exaly  

Conversational Epistemic Injustice: Extending the Insight from Testimonial Injustice to Speech Acts beyond Assertion

Social Epistemology, 2021
David C Spewak Jr
exaly