The Issue of Proxies and Choice Architectures. Why EU Law Matters for Recommender Systems. [PDF]
Front Artif Intell, 2022 Hildebrandt M.
europepmc +1 more source
Interpol review of digital evidence for 2019-2022. [PDF]
Forensic Sci Int Synerg, 2023 Reedy P.
europepmc +1 more source
Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review. [PDF]
F1000Res, 2020 Oxman AD, García LM.
europepmc +1 more source
A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the U.S.A.
, 2015 Secondary and university instructors in the United States rely heavily on the Toulmin model to teach written argumentation. To date, pragma-dialectics (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004; van Eemeren 2010) is not a visible presence in American composition textbooks.
openaire +2 more sources
Wittgenstein and Toulmin’s Model of Argument: The Riddle Explained Away
ArgumentationAbstractThe article undertakes the problem of a Wittgensteinian background of Toulmin’s model of argument. While appreciating the original character of the investigations set out by Toulmin in The Uses of Argument, Wittgenstein’s ideas taken to be forerunners of both Toulmin’s philosophical method and the particular elements of the model of substantial
openaire +1 more source
Interpretive analysis of 85 systematic reviews suggests that narrative syntheses and meta-analyses are incommensurate in argumentation. [PDF]
Res Synth Methods, 2017 Melendez-Torres GJ +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Toulmin Model: A Strategy for Critical Thinking in Analytical Reading [PDF]
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021 openaire +1 more source
La didàctica de les ciències : una empresa racional [PDF]
, 1989 Aliberas i Maymí, Joan +2 more
core +2 more sources
Toulmin's argumentation model facing non-deductive types of reasoning
, 2010 This paper tests Toulmin’s model on the examples of persuasive speeches, hypothesising that it is unable to incorporate the non-deductive types of reasoning (induction, analogical reasoning, cause and effect reasoning, and reasoning by sign). As a conventional Aristotelian form of rhetorical enthymeme, expanded by the backing of the warrant, this model
Nikolić, Davor, Tomić, Diana
openaire +1 more source