The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that improves upon previous attempts to understand fallacies on this argument scheme.
Andrew Pineau
doaj +3 more sources
Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science [PDF]
Toulmin's definition of argument has been used by researchers as a theoretical perspective on argument and as a methodological tool for analysing episodes of oral argumentation.
Simon, Shirley
core +2 more sources
Examining students' use of online annotation tools in support of argumentative reading [PDF]
This study examined how students in a Hong Kong high school used Diigo, an online annotation tool, to support their argumentative reading activities. Two year 10 classes, a high-performance class (HPC) and an ordinary-performance class (OPC), highlighted
Deng, L, Lu, J
core +1 more source
: This research aimed at investigating the effectiveness of Toulmin’s model of argumentation within TWPS strategy on undergraduate students’ critical thinking on argumentative essay.
Eko Suhartoyo +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Argumentative Statements in The 2016 Presidential Debates Of The U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis
This study investigates the argumentative statements of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the debates. By employing two theories, Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Toulmin's model of argument, it aims to expose how various ideologies
Andini Khoirunisa, Rohmani Nur Indah
doaj +1 more source
Should Britain leave the EU? An exploration of online argument through a Toulmin perspective [PDF]
The paper shows how a framework adapted from Toulmin (1958) was valuable in exploring the force of online argument in an educational setting. In past research of online discussions there has been a focus on interaction patterns at the expense of ...
Charalampidi, Marina, Hammond, Michael
core +1 more source
Identifying and promoting young students’ early algebraic thinking
Algebraic thinking is an important part of mathematical thinking, and researchers agree that it is beneficial to develop algebraic thinking from an early age.
Sanna Wettergren
doaj +1 more source
Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics
I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
doaj +1 more source
Rhetorical and Argumentative Analysis of Persuasive Language in Rumi's Majalis Sab’ah: A Study Based on Toulmin’s Theory [PDF]
This study analyzes the rhetorical and argumentative structures of persuasive language in Rumi’s Majalis Sab’ah using Stephen Toulmin’s model of argumentation.
Faezeh Arab Yousefabadi
doaj +1 more source
Critical Discussions in Social Networks of Cyberspace: Argumentation, Fallacies, Flouting a Maxim, Violating a Maxim, and Language Games [PDF]
Discussion is asking for a reason from the others; it is not a one-way presentation of our claims, but an interaction (two-way) communication, where communicators and communicatees change their turns and roles continuously, arguing and reacting to each ...
Sadra Khosravi, Masoud Kousari
doaj +1 more source

