Results 161 to 170 of about 20,438 (206)

An "ethics of strangers"? On knowing the patient in clinical ethics. [PDF]

Med Health Care Philos
Björk J, Hirsch A.
europepmc   +1 more source

Demonstrating consensus in argumentative settings: Co-constructions in children's peer discussions. [PDF]

Eur J Psychol Educ
Kreuz J, Luginbühl M.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Reasoning in BDI agents using Toulmin's argumentation model

Theoretical Computer Science, 2020
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Vágner de Oliveira Gabriel, Alison R. Panisson, Rafael H. Bordini, Diana Francisca Adamatti, Cléo Zanella Billa   +4 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Argumentation-Based Reasoning in BDI Agents Using Toulmin's Model

2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), 2018
The theory of argumentation spans several fields of knowledge, gaining significant space in the community of multiagent systems because it gives support for agents to reason about uncertain beliefs. This work describes the development of an argumentation-based inference architecture for BDI agents, which was developed based on Toulmin's model of ...
Vágner de Oliveira Gabriel, Diana Francisca Adamatti, Alison R. Panisson, Rafael H. Bordini, Cléo Zanella Billa   +4 more
openaire   +3 more sources

New Modification to Toulmin Model as an Analytical Framework for Argumentative Essays

Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2022
Donghong Liu
openaire   +3 more sources

A Computational Approach for Generating Toulmin Model Argumentation

Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, 2015
Automatic generation of arguments is an important task that can be useful for many applications. For instance, the ability to generate coherent arguments during a debate can be useful when determining strengths of supporting evidence. However, with limited technologies that automatically generate arguments, the development of computational models for ...
Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Naoaki Okazaki, Kentaro Inui   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

The Toulmin Model and the Syllogism

Argumentation and Advocacy, 1977
Toulmin's distinctions between backing and warrant, warrant and data, and data and rebuttal, are criticized, as is the Toulmin model's structure.
openaire   +1 more source

Toulmin's Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems

Argumentation, 2005
Toulmin’s (1958) model of argument was employed in the analysis of verbal protocols obtained during the solving of ill-structured problems. The participants were experts in the domain under study. For the analysis the Toulmin model was extended in order to enable description of lines of argument found in protocols as long as 10 paragraphs.
openaire   +1 more source

Contextualizing Toulmin's Model in the Writing Classroom

Written Communication, 2002
Although Toulmin models of argumentation are pervasive in composition textbooks, research on the model's use in writing classrooms has been scarce'typically limited to evaluating how students' essays align with the model's elements (claim, data, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, backing) construed as objective standards.
openaire   +1 more source

Toulmin’s Argumentation Model

1999
In The Uses of Argument (1958), Stephen Toulmin introduces his argumentation model. The central question in this book is which norms must be applied in evaluating argumentation. According to Toulmin, the logical criterion of formal validity is not adequate for the evaluation of arguments in everyday language because it does not take into account the ...
openaire   +1 more source