Results 41 to 50 of about 595 (173)
Implementing Argument‐Based Validity in Second Language Research on Individual Differences
TESOL Quarterly, EarlyView.Abstract Quantitative meta‐syntheses focusing on the psychometric properties of measurement tools in second and foreign language (L2) individual differences (ID) research have drawn scholars' attention to the quality of data collection instruments (Plonsky & Derrick, 2016; Sudina, 2023).
Katalin Piniel, Ekaterina Sudina
wiley +1 more source
Argumentative Statements in The 2016 Presidential Debates Of The U.S: A Critical Discourse Analysis
JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 2022 This study investigates the argumentative statements of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the debates. By employing two theories, Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Toulmin's model of argument, it aims to expose how various ideologies
Andini Khoirunisa, Rohmani Nur Indah
doaj +1 more source
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Many existing rubrics for L2 argumentative writing prioritize form‐based linguistic accuracy and complexity while insufficiently addressing substantive argumentative rigor and effectiveness. This limitation is further complicated by cross‐cultural variation in rhetorical conventions and educational practices, which challenge the direct ...
Zihan Xu, Peiyun Liu
wiley +1 more source
G.H. von Wright's Biographical Sketch of Ludwig Wittgenstein
Philosophical Investigations, EarlyView.ABSTRACT The article presents the history of Georg Henrik von Wright's well‐known biographical sketch of Ludwig Wittgenstein, which first appeared in English in 1955 and was later included in Norman Malcolm's Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. It will be shown that von Wright, during the years 1954–1984, published as many as six versions of the ...
Bernt Österman
wiley +1 more source
Ciência & Educação, 2010 En este artículo, se presenta una breve sistematización acerca de la evolución del concepto de sangre que considera el período histórico que transcurre entre las concepciones de los egipcios hasta el siglo XVII, cuando Harvey consolida un ''modelo ...
Manuel Uribe +3 more
doaj +1 more source
A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse
مجلة الآداب, 2022 Fallacies are common errors in an argument and they undermine the logic of that argument. They obstruct the process of argumentation since they do not contribute to the resolution in difference in opinion. The current study investigates fallacies
Khawla Shukur Mahmood, Sundus Muhsin Ali
doaj +1 more source
Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice
School Science and Mathematics, EarlyView.Abstract Argumentation is an important practice and an explicit goal in educational standards in multiple STEM disciplines. In this descriptive study of elementary teachers' practice, we draw on established frameworks to analyze teacher support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM. We watched over 100 h of video of classroom instruction from
Jenna Menke +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model
Argumentation, 2005 Some solo verbal reasoning serves the function of arriving at a correct answer to a question from information at the reasoner’s disposal. Such reasoning is good if and only if its grounds are justified and adequate, its warrant is justified, and the reasoner is justified in assuming that no defeaters apply.
openaire +2 more sources
Evidence Centered Design: The Contribution of Bob Mislevy in Advancing Validity Theory
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Volume 45, Issue 3, Fall 2026.Abstract Bob Mislevy's conception of evidence‐centered design (ECD) is one of the major contributions to modern validity theory. Building on prior work in psychometrics, philosophy, legal reasoning, and statistics, ECD is a generative framework developed to support the principled design or redesign and scaling of both existing and emerging assessment ...
Drew H. Gitomer
wiley +1 more source
People and Nature, Volume 8, Issue 8, Page 2502-2520, August 2026.Abstract Managing wildfire risk requires consideration of complex and uncertain scientific evidence as well as trade‐offs between different values and goals. Conflicting perspectives on what values and goals are most important, what ought to be done and what trade‐offs are acceptable complicate those decisions.
Pele J. Cannon, Sarah Clement
wiley +1 more source