Results 151 to 160 of about 14,395 (194)

Former Communists Condemning Communism: Ethos, Legitimacy and Ad Hominem Argumentation

, 2007
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Ad hominem arguments in practical argumentation

Argumentation, 1995
This paper is ultimately about the nature of argumentation in general and about the nature of practical argumentation in particular. (Practical argumentation is the form of argumentation which aims at answering the question: ‘What is to be done?’) The approach adopted here is an indirect one.
openaire   +3 more sources

Ad hominem argumentation in politics

Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2018
A healthy and robust public political culture is generally regarded as being of utmost necessity for the maintenance of a stable democratic environment. Especially when a country is facing significant challenges and is in the process of devising and implementing radical reforms, the presence of satisfactory collective deliberation can ensure ...
openaire   +3 more sources

Ad Hominem in Argumentation

2019
Emotional arguments (ad hominem) are messages directed to attacking a person, sidestepping the logical argument. In parliament, members of Parliament (MPs) use emotional arguments and language to influence their opponent or audience attitudes and behavior.
Justina Latenda Amakali, Jairos Kangira, Beatrice Ekanjume-Ilongo   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos

Argumentation, 2009
Perelman’s view of the role of persons in argument is one of the most distinctive features of his break with Cartesian assumptions about reasoning. Whereas the rationalist paradigm sought to minimize or eliminate personal considerations by dismissing them as distracting and irrelevant, Perelman insists that argumentation inevitably does and ought to ...
openaire   +1 more source

The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy

Argumentation, 1987
This article outlines criteria for the evaluation of the argumentum ad hominem (argument against the person, or personal attack in argument) that is traditionally a part of the curriculum in informal logic. The argument is shown to be a kind of criticism which works by shifting the burden of proof in dialogue through citing a pragmatic inconsistency in
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument

Argumentation, 2004
There are two views of the ad hominem argument found in the textbooks and other traditional treatments of this argument, the Lockean or ex concessis view and the view of ad hominem as personal attack. This article addresses problems posed by this ambiguity.
openaire   +1 more source

The ad hominem argument of Berkeley’sAnalyst

British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2018
This paper responds to two issues in interpreting George Berkeley’s Analyst. First, it explains why the text contains no discussion of religious mysteries or points of faith, despite the claims of ...
openaire   +1 more source

Ad hominem argument i uvreda u Hrvatskom saboru

2023
Retorika i politika oduvijek su bile u uskoj vezi, , a ovim radom dat će se prikaz retoričkih vještina saborskih zastupnika u hrvatskom parlamentu. Ad hominem argument („argument protiv čovjeka“) često se koristi u javnom diskursu i cilj mu je narušiti kredibilitet suparnika.
openaire   +1 more source

Ad hominem arguments in political discourse

2013
Tradicionalno, većina priručnika logike ad hominem argumente tretira kao pogreške i u argumentacijskom procesu odbacuju ih kao logički neprihvatljive. Takvo se opće prihvaćeno mišljenje, promijenilo radovima Johnstona (1952) koji je pokazao kako postoje primjeri ad hominem argumenata koji su legitimni i relevantni za raspravu. Nakon toga, od sredine 20.
openaire