Results 21 to 30 of about 14,395 (194)
Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments [PDF]
, 2012 Arguments ad hominem are common in political debates, legal argumentation and everyday conversations. In this article, we propose a general definition of ad hominem arguments. An argument ad hominem is an argument that makes a claim about the reliability of a person in the performance of a certain function, based on some attribute relating to the ...
Christian Dahlman +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Argument ad hominem, argument ad personam i atak osobisty – analiza porównawcza
"Res Rhetorica", 2023 Wiele współczesnych źródeł, od internetowych kursów krytycznego myślenia do podręczników do logiki uznanych autorów, zdaje się pomijać istotną różnicę między trzema różnymi pojęciami: argumentami ad hominem, argumentami ad personam i atakami ad personam (osobistymi). Pierwsze z nich, nazywane na przestrzeni wieków ad hominem lub ex concessis, odwołują
openaire +2 more sources
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2015 This article discusses the role of argumentation in the development of environmental activism during land-development conflicts. Argumentation is analyzed here on three levels: First, protest groups must integrate and incorporate pro-environmental ...
Aurélien Allouche
doaj +1 more source
Perelman, argument ad hominem et ethos rhétorique [PDF]
Argumentation et analyse du discours, 2009 La conception de Perelman sur le rôle des personnes dans l’argumentation est l’une des marques les plus caractéristiques de sa rupture avec les hypothèses cartésiennes sur le raisonnement. Alors que le paradigme rationaliste cherchait à minimiser ou à éliminer les considérations personnelles comme étant dilatoires et non pertinentes dans ce cadre ...
openaire +3 more sources
Quotations and Presumptions: Dialogical Effects of Misquotations
Informal Logic, 2011 Manipulation of quotation, shown to be a common tactic of argumentation in this paper, is associated with fallacies like wrenching from context, hasty generalization, equivocation, accent, the straw man fallacy, and ad hominem arguments. Several examples
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise [PDF]
, 2015 According to the literature, psychological assessment in forensic contexts is one of the most controversial application areas for clinical psychology. This paper presents a review of systematic judgment errors in the forensic field.
Castelnuovo, Gianluca +3 more
core +2 more sources
A Swirl of Semiosis of Communication in Media and Political Discourse
Romanian Journal of Communications and Public Relations, 2019 The 2016 US elections offer the opportunity for interpretation within a continuum of semiotic processes. This is particularly acute in regards to previous events, such as the visit in August 31, 2016 of US president candidate Donald Trump to Mexico ...
Griselda Zárate, Olga Nelly Estrada
doaj +1 more source
From 'scientific revolution' to 'unscientific revolution': an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics [PDF]
, 2010 This paper is devoted to the challenge that generative linguistics poses for linguistic historiography. As a first step, it presents a systematic overview of 19 approaches to the history of generative linguistics.
Aarsleff +98 more
core +1 more source
, 2011 The quality of our public discourse – think of the climate change debate for instance – is never very high. A day spent observing it reveals a litany of misrepresentation and error, argumentative fallacy, and a general lack of good will.
Steve, Matthews
core
Silence as an argument and a manifestation of respect in the argumentation in John Locke's works
Sententiae, 2019 In the article, referring to the method of rational reconstruction described by R. Rorty, an analysis of some works of J. Locke has been made in order to identify new prospects in John Locke's philosophy researches.
Olena Shcherbyna, Nataliia Shcherbyna
doaj +1 more source