Results 61 to 70 of about 14,395 (194)

Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme

Journal of Applied Logic, 2010
AbstractIn this paper, several examples from the literature, and one central new one, are used as case studies of texts of discourse containing an argumentation scheme that has now been widely investigated in literature on argumentation. Argumentation schemes represent common patterns of reasoning used in everyday conversational discourse.
openaire   +1 more source

The Pragmatics of Obscuring in Political Philosophy

Journal of Applied Philosophy, Volume 42, Issue 3, Page 1039-1058, July 2025.
ABSTRACT According to the obscuring objection against mainstream political philosophy, there has been a long‐standing dominant research paradigm focusing on distributive justice. This has made it difficult to call attention to important social facts, such as discrimination and oppression.
Stina Björkholm, Nicolas Olsson Yaouzis
wiley   +1 more source

Marshall's Ignorant Hand

Milton Quarterly, Volume 59, Issue 3, Page 128-138, October 2025.
Tomos Evans
wiley   +1 more source

Changing “Sex”

Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Page 407-422, July 2025.
Abstract Can you change sex? Can you change the meaning of the concept “sex”? Does changing “sex” make changing sex possible? Would changing “sex” to make changing sex not only possible but also easy be a good thing? Might it, as some argue, help us bring about a new way of thinking and of acting that liberates us from the logic of heteronormativity ...
Neil Gascoigne
wiley   +1 more source

Intellectual humility and argumentation [PDF]

, 2020
In this chapter I argue that intellectual humility is related to argumentation in several distinct but mutually supporting ways. I begin by drawing connections between humility and two topics of long-standing importance to the evaluation of informal ...
Aberdein, Andrew
core  

Anscombe on the shallowness of consequentialism

European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 737-747, June 2025.
Abstract This paper is divided into two parts. In the first I outline and defend Elizabeth Anscombe's claim that consequentialism is a shallow philosophy by considering how two contemporary consequentialists reach opposing but equally outlandish moral conclusions on a matter as fundamental as whether it is good or bad that the human race continues.
Craig Taylor
wiley   +1 more source

Notes sur le modèle occidental de l’argumentation au prisme de l’argumentation chinoise

Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
This article interrogates the Western “confrontational” model of argumentation, discourse/counter-discourse, and a possible alternative to the Toulminian model, through the prism of Chinese argumentation. It is based on a selection of translated extracts
Christian Plantin
doaj   +1 more source

The interplay between progressivism and logical fallacy: implications for climate change communications

Environmental Research Communications
The spread of fake news and the influence of moral reasoning on public opinion present significant challenges in climate change communication. This study examines how the ideological underpinnings of conservatism and liberalism, combined with logical ...
Mehmet Özer Demir, Zuhal Gök Demir, Fulya Erendağ Sümer, Çiğdem Karakaya, Hediye Aydoğan, Burak Arslan   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Disinformation by Proponents of Perkins’ Patent “Metallick Tractors” (1798–1806) to Sway Public Opinion in Britain in Favor of a Fraudulent Therapy

Histories
In 1796, American physician Elisha Perkins patented “metallick Tractors” for the treatment of various ailments, particularly those associated with pain.
Douglas J. Lanska
doaj   +1 more source

Normativity, interpretation, and Bayesian models [PDF]

, 2014
It has been suggested that evaluative normativity should be expunged from the psychology of reasoning. A broadly Davidsonian response to these arguments is presented. It is suggested that two distinctions, between different types of rationality, are more
Oaksford, Mike
core   +2 more sources