Results 1 to 10 of about 96,108 (261)
ARGAEL: ARGument Annotation and Evaluation tooL
SoftwareX, 2023 Argument mining aims to automatically extract structured argumentative information existing in natural language text, and it is commonly performed by machine and deep learning models that require accurately and meaningfully labeled corpora. In this paper,
Andrés Segura-Tinoco, Iván Cantador
doaj +3 more sources
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument
Informal Logic, 2004 A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro
doaj +3 more sources
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating argumentation frameworks. This article is based on the following research question: Which semantics corresponds well to what humans consider a rational judgment on the acceptability of arguments?
Marcos Cramer, Leendert van der Torre
openaire +5 more sources
Frontiers in Communication, 2022 We study the influence of argument sources on argument quality evaluations. Argument source refers to the person who present the argument. We ask whether partial, impartial and reluctant sources generate different evaluations of argument quality.
Kaisa Herne +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Knowing, Thinking, and Learning
Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2022 We examined the relationship between the levels of sophistication (high-sophisticated and low-sophisticated) of students’ domain general epistemic beliefs and an important component of students’ critical thinking skills—their ability to evaluate ...
Srikanth Dandotkar +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Evaluating Fairness in Argument Retrieval [PDF]
Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2021 Accepted at CIKM ...
Sachin Pathiyan Cherumanal +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
A Critique of the Existential Argument Based on the Prediction Difference by One of the Commentators of Sadr al-Mutallahin [PDF]
Comparative Theology, 2021 The existential argument in contemporary Islamic philosophy has been criticized on the basis of one of the initiatives and innovations in this philosophy.
Mohammad Meshkat
doaj +1 more source
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2004 The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable.
Alvin I. Goldman
doaj +1 more source
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Artificial Intelligence, 2006 AbstractEvaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs. undesirable) or right (vs. wrong). With the proliferation of on-line systems serving as personal advisors and assistants, there is a pressing need to develop general
Giuseppe Carenini, Johanna D. Moore
openaire +1 more source
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Artificial Intelligence, 2007 zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Martin Caminada, Leila Amgoud
openaire +1 more source