Results 11 to 20 of about 1,331,962 (291)
A Critique of the Existential Argument Based on the Prediction Difference by One of the Commentators of Sadr al-Mutallahin [PDF]
Comparative Theology, 2021 The existential argument in contemporary Islamic philosophy has been criticized on the basis of one of the initiatives and innovations in this philosophy.
Mohammad Meshkat
doaj +1 more source
Eudaimonistic Argumentation [PDF]
, 2020 Virtue theories have lately enjoyed a modest vogue in the study of argumentation, echoing the success of more far-reaching programmes in ethics and epistemology.
A Aberdein +23 more
core +1 more source
An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2023 In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating argumentation frameworks. This article is based on the following research question: Which semantics corresponds well to what humans consider a rational judgment on the acceptability of arguments?
Marcos Cramer, Leendert van der Torre
openaire +3 more sources
New Dialectical Rules For Ambiguity
Informal Logic, 2000 A set often rules is proposed for dealing with problems of ambiguity when interpreting a text of argumentative discourse. The rules are based on Grice's pragmatic rules for a collaborative conversation and on principles and maxims used to deal with ...
Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
A Unitary Schema for Arguments by Analogy
Informal Logic, 2012 Following a Toulmian account of argument analysis and evaluation, I offer a general unitary schema for, so called, deductive and inductive types of analogical arguments.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque
doaj +3 more sources
The Generalized Criterion of Relevance for Argument Evaluation [PDF]
Future Human Image, 2021 The paper is devoted to the relevance criterion of argument evaluation within argumentation theory. Argument evaluation is a tool to avoid misunderstanding and misleading in argumentation — one of the most basic forms of human communications. The purpose
Viktoriia Babiuk
doaj +1 more source
Pareto Optimality and Strategy Proofness in Group Argument Evaluation (Extended Version) [PDF]
, 2017 An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among them. There can be more than one consistent way to evaluate such an argumentation graph.
Awad, Edmond +4 more
core +5 more sources
Laypeople’s Evaluation of Arguments: Are Criteria for Argument Quality Scheme-Specific? [PDF]
Argumentation, 2017 Can argumentation schemes play a part in the critical processing of argumentation by lay people? In a qualitative study, participants were invited to come up with strong and weak arguments for a given claim and were subsequently interviewed for why they thought the strong argument was stronger than the weak one. Next, they were presented with a list of
Peter Jan Schellens +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments
Informal Logic, 2023 Many have argued that it is impossible to determine criteria to identify good arguments. In this contribution, we argue that it is at least possible to identify features of objectively bad arguments.
Michael Hoffmann, Richard Catrambone
doaj +1 more source
Informal Logic, 2009 An argument evaluation inventory distinguishing between different levels of theory-evidence differentiation was designed corresponding to the levels of argument observed in argument generation tasks.
Petra Barchfeld, Beate Sodian
doaj +1 more source