Results 11 to 20 of about 16,600,438 (304)
Pareto Optimality and Strategy Proofness in Group Argument Evaluation (Extended Version) [PDF]
An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among them. There can be more than one consistent way to evaluate such an argumentation graph.
Awad, Edmond +4 more
core +7 more sources
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation
The virtues and vices of argument are now an established part of argumentation theory. They have helped direct attention to hitherto neglected aspects of how we argue.
Andrew Aberdein
doaj +2 more sources
An argument evaluation inventory distinguishing between different levels of theory-evidence differentiation was designed corresponding to the levels of argument observed in argument generation tasks.
Petra Barchfeld, Beate Sodian
doaj +2 more sources
RuArg-2022: Argument Mining Evaluation [PDF]
Argumentation analysis is a field of computational linguistics that studies methods for extracting arguments from texts and the relationships between them, as well as building argumentation structure of texts.
E. Kotelnikov +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
According to the argument scheme approach, to evaluate a given scheme-saturating instance completely does entail asking all critical questions (CQs) relevant to it.
Shiyang Yu, F. Zenker
semanticscholar +1 more source
As the media landscape is increasingly populated by less than reputable sources of information, educators have turned to argument evaluation training as a potential solution.
Nicholas Diana +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Transformer-Based Models for Automatic Identification of Argument Relations: A Cross-Domain Evaluation [PDF]
Argument mining is defined as the task of automatically identifying and extracting argumentative components (e.g., premises, claims, etc.) and detecting the existing relations among them (i.e., support, attack, rephrase, no relation).
Ramon Ruiz-Dolz +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Four experiments examined the claims that people can intuitively assess the logical validity of arguments, and that qualitatively different reasoning processes drive intuitive and explicit validity assessments.
B. Hayes +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
A Critique of the Existential Argument Based on the Prediction Difference by One of the Commentators of Sadr al-Mutallahin [PDF]
The existential argument in contemporary Islamic philosophy has been criticized on the basis of one of the initiatives and innovations in this philosophy.
Mohammad Meshkat
doaj +1 more source
Eudaimonistic Argumentation [PDF]
Virtue theories have lately enjoyed a modest vogue in the study of argumentation, echoing the success of more far-reaching programmes in ethics and epistemology.
A Aberdein +23 more
core +1 more source

