Results 21 to 30 of about 1,331,962 (291)
Justification and Argumentation
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2014 In her paper “Argumentation theory and the conception of epistemic justification”, Lilian Bermejo-Luque presents a critique of deductivism in argumentation theory, as well as her own concept of epistemic justification inspired by the views of Stephen ...
Szymanek Krzysztof
doaj +1 more source
Localism vs. Individualism for the Scientific Realism Debate [PDF]
, 2019 Localism is the view that the unit of evaluation in the scientific realism debate is a single scientific discipline, sub-discipline, or claim, whereas individualism is the view that the unit of evaluation is a single scientific theory.
Block Ned +10 more
core +4 more sources
Romanian Journal of English Studies, 2014 The article applies a recently developed framework for the reconstruction and evaluation of arguments based on practical reasoning (Fairclough and Fairclough 2012) to the analysis of a public consultation session organised by the Romanian Ministry of ...
Mădroane Irina Diana
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians’ argumentative tweets—A coded dataset
Data in Brief, 2022 This coded database presents a corpus of argumentative tweets published by four politicians (Matteo Salvini, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro, and Joe Biden) within 6 months from their taking office, which corresponds to the official end of their election ...
Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
An independent axiomatisation for free short-circuit logic [PDF]
, 2017 Short-circuit evaluation denotes the semantics of propositional connectives in which the second argument is evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression.
Ponse, Alban, Staudt, Daan J. C.
core +3 more sources
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2004 The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable.
Alvin I. Goldman
doaj +1 more source
Numerical calculation of Bessel, Hankel and Airy functions
, 2011 The numerical evaluation of an individual Bessel or Hankel function of large order and large argument is a notoriously problematic issue in physics. Recurrence relations are inefficient when an individual function of high order and argument is to be ...
Abramowitz +51 more
core +1 more source
An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of perceived argument strength
Studies in Communication Sciences, 2022 According to Mercier and Sperber (2009, 2011, 2017), people have an immediate and intuitive feeling about the strength of an argument. These intuitive evaluations are not captured by current evaluation methods of argument strength, yet they could be ...
Jos Hornikx +2 more
doaj +1 more source
From chunks to function-argument structure : a similarity-based approach [PDF]
, 2001 Chunk parsing has focused on the recognition of partial constituent structures at the level of individual chunks. Little attention has been paid to the question of how such partial analyses can be combined into larger structures for complete utterances ...
Hinrichs, Erhard, Kübler, Sandra
core +4 more sources
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Artificial Intelligence, 2006 AbstractEvaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs. undesirable) or right (vs. wrong). With the proliferation of on-line systems serving as personal advisors and assistants, there is a pressing need to develop general
Carenini, Giuseppe, Moore, Johanna D.
openaire +1 more source