Results 21 to 30 of about 19,843 (253)
Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
Informal Logic, 2008 This paper begins a working through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation schemes and their attendant critical questions, in which we propose a number of solutions to some outstanding theoretical issues.
David Godden, Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Justification of Argumentation Schemes
The Australasian Journal of Logic, 2005 Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, especially defeasible ones like argument from expert opinion, that have proved troublesome to view deductively or inductively. Much practical work has already been done on argumentation schemes, proving their worth in A1 [19], but more precise ...
openaire +2 more sources
Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions
Informal Logic, 2010 We contend that it is possible to argue reasonably for and against arguments from classifications and definitions, provided they are seen as defeasible (subject to exceptions and critical questioning).
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue
Co-herencia: Revista de Humanidades, 2020 The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation.
Christopher W. Tindale
doaj +1 more source
The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
Informal Logic, 2015 Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all.
Douglas Walton
doaj +3 more sources
Polylogarithmic two-round argument systems
Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, 2008 We present a two-round argument system for NP languages with polylogarithmic communication complexity. We introduce a novel property of private information retrieval (PIR) schemes, that we call database-awareness.
Mie Thilo
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Primary lung carcinomas and bronchial carcinoid tumors (BC) are very rare malignancies in childhood. While typical BC and mucoepidermoid carcinomas are mostly low‐grade, localized tumors with a more favorable prognosis than in adults, necessitating avoidance of overtreatment, adenocarcinomas of the lung are often diagnosed at advanced disease ...
Michael Abele +19 more
wiley +1 more source
Argument Schemes for Explainable Planning
CoRR, 2020 Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used to develop systems that produce intelligent solutions. However, there is a major concern that whether the systems built will be trusted by humans. In order to establish trust in AI systems, there is a need for the user to understand the reasoning behind their solutions and therefore, the system ...
Quratul-ain Mahesar, Simon Parsons
openaire +2 more sources
Analogical Arguments in Persuasive and Deliberative Contexts
Informal Logic, 2018 This paper uses argumentation tools such as argument diagrams and argumentation schemes to analyze four examples of argument from analogy, and argues that to proceed from there to evaluating these arguments, features of the context of dialogue need to be
Douglas Walton, Curtis Hyra
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Pediatric gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP‐NENs) are extremely rare and clinically heterogeneous. Management has largely been extrapolated from adult practice. This European Standard Clinical Practice Guideline (ESCP), developed by the EXPeRT network in collaboration with adult NEN experts, provides (adult) evidence ...
Michaela Kuhlen +23 more
wiley +1 more source