Results 31 to 40 of about 19,843 (253)
Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета: Серия 2. Языкознание, 2017 The article presents the author's typology of classification schemes of argumentation created on the basis of the analysis of Russian-language and Belarusian-language humanities.
Tatyana N. Savchuk
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Background Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk of severe outcomes from SARS‐CoV‐2 (SCV2). In the post‐pandemic context, where most children have been infected with SCV2, there are limited data on whether vaccination remains beneficial in children with ALL.
Janna R. Shapiro +11 more
wiley +1 more source
Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic
Informal Logic, 2011 This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin’s dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin’s dialectical stance.
Jan A. van Laar
doaj +1 more source
Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge for Blockchain: A Survey
IEEE Access, 2020 We survey the state-of-the-art non-interactive zero-knowledge argument schemes and their applications in confidential transactions and private smart contracts on blockchain.
Juha Partala +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Background An internal tandem duplication in the gene encoding Fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3‐ITD) is associated with high relapse risk and poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and plays a crucial role in treatment decisions. Measurable residual disease (MRD) analysis of FLT3‐ITD during and after treatment has shown prognostic ...
Sofie Johansson Alm +11 more
wiley +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Background Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is assessed by cell counting and cytomorphology from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and is used for treatment stratification worldwide. The ratio of “CNS2” patients in clinical trials ranges from 3% to 40%, with unclear prognostic significance ...
Laura Almási +14 more
wiley +1 more source
Assessing Arguments with Schemes and Fallacies [PDF]
, 2019 We present a logical framework allowing us to express assessment offacts (is it proven?) and arguments (is it sound?) together with a proofsystem to answer these questions. Our motivation is to clarify the notion of validity in the context of logic-based arguments along different aspects (such as the formulas used and the inference scheme).
Bisquert, Pierre +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy
Informal Logic, 2021 Herein, I consider arguments resting on an appeal to a non-existent authority as a species of argument from authority, and ultimately show them to be reliant on arguments from analogy in their inferential force. Three sub-types of argument are discussed:
Martin Hinton
doaj
ON THE DEFINITION OF CONDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Crítica, 2019 In 1971, Wellman coined the terms “conduction” and “conductive”to name a distinctive kind of reasoning, different both from deductive and in-ductive reasoning. Most authors think that the weighing of pros and cons is thedistinctive feature of conduction.
HUBERTO MARRAUD
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Immune effector cell‐associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis‐like syndrome (IEC‐HS) is a life‐threatening hyperinflammatory toxicity distinct from cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity following chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy. In a single‐institution retrospective cohort of pediatric and young adult patients
Thomas J. Galletta +6 more
wiley +1 more source