Results 31 to 40 of about 114,690 (292)
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1996 In this paper we explore the thesis that the role of argumentation in practical reasoning in general and legal reasoning in particular is to justify the use of defeasible rules to derive a conclusion in preference to the use of other defeasible rules to derive a conflicting conclusion. The defeasibility of rules is expressed by means of non-provability
Robert A. Kowalski, Francesca Toni
openaire +2 more sources
Neurophenomenology revisited: second-person methods for the study of human consciousness
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015 In the study of consciousness, neurophenomenology was originally established as a novel research program attempting to reconcile two apparently irreconcilable methodologies in psychology: qualitative and quantitative methods.
Francisco Andrés Olivares +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Interdisciplinary Use of Argumentation among Religious Education and Philosophy Teachers-in-Training
Religions, 2022 Using document analysis, religion and philosophy pre-service teachers’ reflections on argumentation and in-class argumentation practices, which were received online, during the Special Teaching Methods course were examined.
Esme Hacıeminoğlu +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Psychology, 2014 Argumentation is a crucial component of our lives. Although in the absence of rational debate our legal, political, and scientific systems would not be possible, there is still no integrated area of research on the psychology of argumentation ...
Marco eLillo-Unglaube +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation [PDF]
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2020 The idea of resolving dispute through the exchange of arguments and reasons has been central to society for millennia. We exchange arguments as a way of getting at the truth in contexts as diverse as science, the court room, and our everyday lives. In democracies, political decisions should be negotiated through argument, not deception, or even worse ...
openaire +2 more sources
International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2022 We introduce the Forecasting Argumentation Framework (FAF), a novel argumentation framework for forecasting informed by recent judgmental forecasting research. FAFs comprise update frameworks which empower (human or artificial) agents to argue over time with and about probability of scenarios, whilst flagging perceived irrationality in their behaviour ...
Irwin, Benjamin +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
The Language of Argumentation: A Book Review
Journal of Language and Education, 2021 The Language of Argumentation by Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen, & Maarten van Leeuwen (Eds). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2021 aims to provide important theoretical insights to the international community of argumentation theorists by ...
Nico Irawan, Tri Febrianti Valentina
doaj +1 more source
Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2019 Donald Trump’s speeches and messages are characterized by terms that are commonly referred to as “thick” or “emotive,” meaning that they are characterized by a tendency to be used to generate emotive reactions. This paper investigates how emotive meaning
Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Education, 2022 Research on diagnosing in teacher education has primarily emphasized the accuracy of diagnostic judgments and has explained it in terms of factors such as diagnostic knowledge.
Elisabeth Bauer +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation-based fault diagnosis for home networks [PDF]
, 2011 Home networks are a fast growing market but managing them is a difficult task, and diagnosing faults is even more challenging. Current fault management tools provide comprehensive information about the network and the devices but it is left to the user ...
Dong, Changyu, Dulay, Naranker
core +4 more sources