Results 21 to 30 of about 79,792 (314)
Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments [PDF]
, 2007 Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments.
Erkens, G. +3 more
core +1 more source
Neurophenomenology revisited: second-person methods for the study of human consciousness
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015 In the study of consciousness, neurophenomenology was originally established as a novel research program attempting to reconcile two apparently irreconcilable methodologies in psychology: qualitative and quantitative methods.
Francisco Andrés Olivares +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Argument Invention with the Carneades Argumentation System
SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 2017 Argument invention (inventio) has traditionally been regarded as one of the five main components of rhetoric, but has remained an ambiguous, vague and highly contested concept, made even more confusing by its dependence on the Aristotelian topics ...
Thomas F. Gordon** Douglas Walton*
doaj +1 more source
Interdisciplinary Use of Argumentation among Religious Education and Philosophy Teachers-in-Training
Religions, 2022 Using document analysis, religion and philosophy pre-service teachers’ reflections on argumentation and in-class argumentation practices, which were received online, during the Special Teaching Methods course were examined.
Esme Hacıeminoğlu +1 more
doaj +1 more source
An empirical study of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogue [PDF]
, 2012 Collaborative decision making among agents in a team is a complex activity, and tasks to achieve individual objectives may conflict in a team context. A number of argumentation-based models have been proposed to address the problem, the rationale being ...
Sycara, Katia +4 more
core +1 more source
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1996 In this paper we explore the thesis that the role of argumentation in practical reasoning in general and legal reasoning in particular is to justify the use of defeasible rules to derive a conclusion in preference to the use of other defeasible rules to derive a conflicting conclusion. The defeasibility of rules is expressed by means of non-provability
Robert A. Kowalski, Francesca Toni
openaire +1 more source
Emotive Meaning in Political Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2019 Donald Trump’s speeches and messages are characterized by terms that are commonly referred to as “thick” or “emotive,” meaning that they are characterized by a tendency to be used to generate emotive reactions. This paper investigates how emotive meaning
Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
The Language of Argumentation: A Book Review
Journal of Language and Education, 2021 The Language of Argumentation by Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen, & Maarten van Leeuwen (Eds). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2021 aims to provide important theoretical insights to the international community of argumentation theorists by ...
Nico Irawan, Tri Febrianti Valentina
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Education, 2022 Research on diagnosing in teacher education has primarily emphasized the accuracy of diagnostic judgments and has explained it in terms of factors such as diagnostic knowledge.
Elisabeth Bauer +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation-based fault diagnosis for home networks [PDF]
, 2011 Home networks are a fast growing market but managing them is a difficult task, and diagnosing faults is even more challenging. Current fault management tools provide comprehensive information about the network and the devices but it is left to the user ...
Dong, Changyu +3 more
core +1 more source