Results 81 to 90 of about 79,540 (181)
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure
Abstract: The concept of argument structure is pivotal in argumentation theory and is extensively employed to analyze and describe arguments. However, as indicated in a previous study (Yu & Zenker, 2022), extant strength-based and relevance-based approaches fall short in distinguishing linked and convergent structures.
openaire +3 more sources
Justification of Argumentation Schemes
Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, especially defeasible ones like argument from expert opinion, that have proved troublesome to view deductively or inductively. Much practical work has already been done on argumentation schemes, proving their worth in A1 [19], but more precise ...
openaire +2 more sources
In the Scandinavian countries, students have a right to have their written exam results reviewed or appealed if they are not satisfied and wish to challenge the grading quality. This process is a way to ensure quality in the decision-making.
Jon Tømmerås Selvik +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The age of artificial intelligence emphasises the possibility of justification and the dialectical aspects of legal reasoning. The need for validity in legal reasoning mainly stems from the existence of exceptions to rules and conflicts between rules ...
Ze Li +7 more
doaj +1 more source
Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric Approach
Argumentation schemes have significantly impacted AI and Law, providing a basis for annotating argument structures in large corpora and generating quantitative data for argument mining. This, in turn, can greatly benefit legal practice in areas such as litigation and consistent adjudication.
Goossens, F. +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
: The paper presents an extended scheme for the inference to the best explanation (IBE). The scheme precisely treats the epistemic modifiers (“hypothetically,” “plausibly,” “presumably”) of the inference, acknowledges its contrastive nature, clarifies ...
Petar Bodlović, Marcin Lewiński
doaj +1 more source
Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach. [PDF]
van Berkel K, Wagemans JHM.
europepmc +1 more source
La pseudo-fallacia dell’argumentum (sub sub-genus) “ad hominem” quale enzima retoricamente onto-teleo-t(etico) per / dell’oratore [PDF]
The paper provides to give a minimal contribution about a typical argumentation scheme which called "ad hominem". Especially, this mode of conduct a dialogue and arguing towards an opponent has been revisited by not long past approaches on Argumentation ...
Cavinato, Francesco
core
Linked Argumentation Graphs for Multidisciplinary Decision Support. [PDF]
Xiao L, Greer D.
europepmc +1 more source
Deontological argumentation: Argumentation schemes and rhetorical devices
Deontological ethics views the morality of an action based upon its accordance with duty or rights, regardless of its consequences. In previous work, we presented some argumentation schemes for descriptive modeling of utilitarian ethical arguments. The premises of those schemes refer to utilitarian concepts such as maximum utility. Here we
openaire +1 more source

