Results 91 to 100 of about 54,796 (286)
Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments
Informal Logic, 2001 Current practice in logic increasingly accords recognition to abductive, presumptive or plausible arguments, in addition to deductive and inductive arguments. But there is uncertainty about what these terms exactly mean, what the differences between them
Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Tracking Motor Progression and Device‐Aided Therapy Eligibility in Parkinson's Disease
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective To characterise the progression of motor symptoms and identify eligibility for device‐aided therapies in Parkinson's disease, using both the 5‐2‐1 criteria and a refined clinical definition, while examining differences across genetic subgroups.
David Ledingham +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians' argumentative tweets-A coded dataset. [PDF]
Data Brief, 2022 Macagno F.
europepmc +1 more source
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective Peripheral neuropathies contribute to patient disability but may be diagnosed late or missed altogether due to late referral, limitation of current diagnostic methods and lack of specialized testing facilities. To address this clinical gap, we developed NeuropathAI, an interpretable deep learning–based multiclass classification ...
Chaima Ben Rabah +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Discursos de embajada en la épica: una propuesta de análisis argumentativo
Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 2018 El artículo propone un modelo de análisis argumentativo que combina elementos de la retórica griega, la lógica india y la teoría de la argu- mentación.
Roberto Morales Harley
doaj +1 more source
Patterns of Postictal Abnormalities in Relation to Status Epilepticus in Adults
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Objective Abnormalities on peri‐ictal diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI‐PMAs) are well‐established for patients with status epilepticus (SE), but knowledge on patterns of DWI‐PMAs and their prognostic impact is sparse. Methods This systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis included observational studies ...
Andrea Enerstad Bolle +11 more
wiley +1 more source
Ontological Foundations for Scholarly Debate Mapping Technology [PDF]
, 2008 Mapping scholarly debates is an important genre of what can be called Knowledge Domain Analytics (KDA) technology – i.e. technology which combines both quantitative and qualitative methods of analysing specialist knowledge domains.
Benn, Neil +3 more
core
Argumentation schemes as a way of arguments studies
Philosophy Journal, 2021 The paper investigates argument (argumentation) schemes that are used in the theory of argumentation for analyzing everyday reasoning. Such schemes should be understood as structures representing the most general types of argument. Today they are studied not only from theoretical perspectives but also in relation to their application in education and ...
openaire +2 more sources
Applying an Ethical Lens to the Treatment of People With Multiple Sclerosis
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, EarlyView.ABSTRACT The practice of neurology requires an understanding of clinical ethics for decision‐making. In multiple sclerosis (MS) care, there are a wide range of ethical considerations that may arise. These involve shared decision‐making around selection of a disease‐modifying therapy (DMT), risks and benefits of well‐studied medications in comparison to
Methma Udawatta, Farrah J. Mateen
wiley +1 more source
Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts
Informal Logic, 2008 The paper presents the theoretical and methodological aspects of research on the development of argument- ation in elementary school children. It presents a theoretical framework detailing psychological mechanisms responsible for the acquisition and ...
Anita Reznitskaya, Richard C. Anderson
doaj +1 more source