Results 11 to 20 of about 2,211 (278)
Argumentation schemes in AI and Law [PDF]
In this paper we describe the impact that Walton’s conception of argumentation schemes had on AI and Law research. We will discuss developments in argumentation in AI and Law before Walton’s schemes became known in that community, and the issues that were current in that work. We will then show how Walton’s schemes provided a means of addressing all of
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
openaire +3 more sources
Argumentation schemes for clinical decision support [PDF]
This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help clinicians in making treatment decisions. The work builds on the use of computational argumentation, a rigorous approach to reasoning with complex data that places strong emphasis on being able to justify and explain the decisions that are recommended ...
Sassoon, I +3 more
core +10 more sources
Justification of Argumentation Schemes
Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, especially defeasible ones like argument from expert opinion, that have proved troublesome to view deductively or inductively. Much practical work has already been done on argumentation schemes, proving their worth in A1 [19], but more precise ...
Walton, Douglas
core +4 more sources
A classification system for argumentation schemes [PDF]
This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification.
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
openaire +3 more sources
Encompassing Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes. [PDF]
peer ...
BARONI, Pietro +3 more
openaire +4 more sources
Argumentation Schemes for Collaborative Planning [PDF]
We address the collaborative planning problem among agents where they have different objectives and norms. In this context, agreeing on the best course of action to adopt represents a significant challenge. Concurrent actions and causal plan-constraints may lead to conflicts of opinion on what to do.
Alice Toniolo +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments [PDF]
We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for developing a natural classification of arguments, benefit work in artificial intelligence. Focusing only on arguments construed as the semantic entities that are the outcome of processes of reasoning, we outline and clarify our view that an argument is a ...
Katzav, Joel, Reed, Chris
openaire +5 more sources
Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure
This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragma-dialectical theory of argument schemes and argument structures, and how one should properly ...
Andre Juthe
doaj +3 more sources
The Language of Argumentation: A Book Review
The Language of Argumentation by Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen, & Maarten van Leeuwen (Eds). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2021 aims to provide important theoretical insights to the international community of argumentation theorists by ...
Nico Irawan, Tri Febrianti Valentina
doaj +1 more source
Identifying Argumentation Schemes [PDF]
Argumentation is always a defense of a point of view: (a) Mother: “I don’t think five pounds pocket money is at all necessary; your sister always got two pounds a week.” Daughter: “That was years ago, and Betty, Monica, and all my other girlfriends get five or six pounds.” (b) History teacher: “Funny that you don’t want ...
van Eemeren, F.H., Kruiger, T.
openaire +2 more sources

