Results 21 to 30 of about 2,211 (278)
How to Disagree About Argument Schemes
Informal Logic, 2016 Argumentation theorists often disagree about which scheme best represents a given type of argument (e.g. argument by analogy, argument from authority, inference to the best explanation).
Fábio Perin Shecaira
doaj +3 more sources
Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2022 Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine.
Tamara Dudash
doaj +1 more source
An empirical study of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogue [PDF]
, 2012 Collaborative decision making among agents in a team is a complex activity, and tasks to achieve individual objectives may conflict in a team context. A number of argumentation-based models have been proposed to address the problem, the rationale being ...
Sycara, Katia +4 more
core +1 more source
Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic
Informal Logic, 2011 This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin’s dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin’s dialectical stance.
Jan A. van Laar
doaj +1 more source
Summary Report of The First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation [PDF]
, 2016 Computational models of argumentation are an active research discipline within Artificial Intelligence that has grown since the beginning of the 1990s (Dung 1995).
Vallati, Mauro +17 more
core +1 more source
Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy
Informal Logic, 2012 In this paper a hybrid model of argument from analogy is presented that combines argumentation schemes and story schemes. One premise of the argumentation scheme for argument from analogy in the model claims that one case is similar to another.
Douglas Walton
doaj +3 more sources
Argumentation schemes from Hamblin's dialectical perspective [PDF]
, 2011 This paper aims at a normative account of non-deductive argumentation schemes in the spirit of Hamblin's dialectical philosophy. First, three principles are presented that characterize Hamblin's dialectical stance.
van Laar, J.A.; id_orcid
core +3 more sources
Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments [PDF]
, 2007 Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments.
Erkens, G. +3 more
core +1 more source
Informal Logic, 2015 This paper presents a formalization of informal logic using the Carneades Argumentation System (CAS), a formal, computational model of argument that consists of a formal model of argument graphs and audiences.
Douglas Walton, Thomas F. Gordon
doaj +3 more sources
Argument from Ignorance and Argument from Silence
Дискурс, 2021 Introduction. This article focuses on the specifics of the arguments from ignorance and arguments from silence. The relevance of the work is due to the growing interest of the scientific community in modeling of defeasible (presumptive) reasoning and ...
E. N. Lisanyuk, A. A. Khamidov
doaj +1 more source