Results 31 to 40 of about 246,980 (329)
Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argument Structure
Informal Logic, 2015 This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragma-dialectical theory of argument schemes and argument structures, and how one should properly ...
Andre Juthe
doaj +3 more sources
Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang
Hermes, 1998 In this article, the author presents some fundamentals of a modular linguistic approach to argumentation. Argumentation is seen as a matter of interpretation, and since interpretation phenomena depend on linguistic material as well as on context in the ...
Henning Nølke
doaj +1 more source
Civil Procedure as a Critical Discussion [PDF]
, 2020 This Article develops a model for analyzing legal dispute resolution systems as systems for argumentation. Our model meshes two theories of argument conceived centuries apart: contemporary argumentation theory and classical stasis theory. In this Article,
Larson, Brian N., Provenzano, Susan E.
core +2 more sources
Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach
Informal Logic, 2005 The main rationale for adopting the epistemological approach to argumentation seems to take the form of a criticism of the consensus theory. This criticism says that some instances of clearly bad argumentation count as acceptable instances of ...
Brian Huss
doaj +1 more source
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms
Informal Logic, 2021 This paper seeks to complicate two primary norms within argumentation theory: 1) engaging with one’s interlocutors in a ‘pleasant’ tone and 2) speaking directly to one’s target audience/interlocutor.
Tempest Henning
doaj +1 more source
Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation
Informal Logic, 2003 This article examines two approaches to the analysis and critical assessment of scientific argumentation. The first approach employs the discourse theory that Jurgen Habermas has developed on the basis of his theory of communicative action and applied to
William Rehg
doaj +1 more source
Evidence, Proofs, and Derivations [PDF]
, 2019 The traditional view of evidence in mathematics is that evidence is just proof and proof is just derivation. There are good reasons for thinking that this view should be rejected: it misrepresents both historical and current mathematical practice ...
Aberdein, Andrew
core +2 more sources
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2022 In this paper, I spell out and argue for a new epistemic theory of argumentation. Contrary to extant views, this theory is compatible with a pluralistic framework on argumentation, where the norms governing argumentation depend on the aim with which we ...
Job de Grefte
doaj
Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2022 Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine.
Tamara Dudash
doaj +1 more source
Pushing the bounds of rationality: Argumentation and extended cognition [PDF]
, 2016 One of the central tasks of a theory of argumentation is to supply a theory of appraisal: a set of standards and norms according to which argumentation, and the reasoning involved in it, is properly evaluated.
Godden, David
core