Results 41 to 50 of about 6,787,949 (343)
Useful Argumentation: A Critique of the Epistemological Approach
Informal Logic, 2005 The main rationale for adopting the epistemological approach to argumentation seems to take the form of a criticism of the consensus theory. This criticism says that some instances of clearly bad argumentation count as acceptable instances of ...
Brian Huss
doaj +1 more source
“I Said What I Said”—Black Women and Argumentative Politeness Norms
Informal Logic, 2021 This paper seeks to complicate two primary norms within argumentation theory: 1) engaging with one’s interlocutors in a ‘pleasant’ tone and 2) speaking directly to one’s target audience/interlocutor.
Tempest Henning
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation and Game Theory [PDF]
, 2009 In a large class of multi-agent systems, agents are self-interested in the sense that each agent is interested only in furthering its individual goals, which may or may not coincide with others’ goals. When such agents engage in argument, they would be expected to argue strategically in such a way that makes it more likely for their argumentative goals
Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson
openaire +1 more source
Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation
Informal Logic, 2003 This article examines two approaches to the analysis and critical assessment of scientific argumentation. The first approach employs the discourse theory that Jurgen Habermas has developed on the basis of his theory of communicative action and applied to
William Rehg
doaj +1 more source
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2022 In this paper, I spell out and argue for a new epistemic theory of argumentation. Contrary to extant views, this theory is compatible with a pluralistic framework on argumentation, where the norms governing argumentation depend on the aim with which we ...
Job de Grefte
doaj
Introduction to the Special Issue “Boundaries between dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory”
Dialogic Pedagogy, 2023 Dialogue and argumentation are two processes that complement and mutually influence each other. However, this essential relationship is not sufficiently acknowledged by current educational research.
Chrysi Rapanta, Fabrizio Macagno
doaj +1 more source
Pushing the bounds of rationality: Argumentation and extended cognition [PDF]
, 2016 One of the central tasks of a theory of argumentation is to supply a theory of appraisal: a set of standards and norms according to which argumentation, and the reasoning involved in it, is properly evaluated.
Godden, David
core
Human-Agent Decision-making: Combining Theory and Practice
, 2016 Extensive work has been conducted both in game theory and logic to model strategic interaction. An important question is whether we can use these theories to design agents for interacting with people?
Kraus, Sarit
core +2 more sources
Making tau amyloid models in vitro: a crucial and underestimated challenge
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.This review highlights the challenges of producing in vitro amyloid assemblies of the tau protein. We review how accurately the existing protocols mimic tau deposits found in the brain of patients affected with tauopathies. We discuss the important properties that should be considered when forming amyloids and the benchmarks that should be used to ...
Julien Broc, Clara Piersson, Yann Fichou
wiley +1 more source
Analyzing Legal Argumentation: What Theoretical Model Is the Most Comprehensive?
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2022 Today, there is a clear need in developing a unified theoretical model of legal argumentation viable for all areas of legal practice and legal doctrine.
Tamara Dudash
doaj +1 more source