Results 61 to 70 of about 246,881 (230)
How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review. [PDF]
Kinnear B +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Strengthening Critical Health Literacy for Health Information Appraisal: An Approach from Argumentation Theory. [PDF]
Rubinelli S +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
INVESTIGATING HIGHER EDUCATION COURSE LEADERSHIP PRACTICE – AN ARGUMENT FOR USING GROUNDED THEORY
Nieky van Veggel +2 more
openalex +2 more sources
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory
This paper argues that Habermas's conception of the rationality of moral and legal discussions has import for argumentation theorists interested in the rationality of public deliberations in politics and law.
Eveline T. Feteris
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation has proved a useful tool in defining formal semantics for assumption-based reasoning by viewing a proof as a process in which proponents and opponents attack each others arguments by undercuts (attack to an argument's premise) and rebuts ...
Michael Schroeder +3 more
core +2 more sources
Why Queerness is not enough [PDF]
Moral error theorists often claim to be strongly anti‑metaphysical in their moral scepticism and atheistic naturalists. This paper argues that pre‑ cisely this becomes a problem for them, when their metaethical and ontologi‑
David, Kretz
core
Language and argumentation in the controversy economic [PDF]
This article offers an approach to the general structure of the controversy in economy. In our case we adopted a perspective to study a particular aspect of the rhetoric that comes from the context of a particular controversy: the controversy on the ...
Estrada, Fernando
core +1 more source
The rhetoric of economics [PDF]
This article offers an approach to the general structure of the rhetoric in economy. In our case we adopted a perspective to study a particular aspect of the rhetoric that comes from the context of a particular controversy: the controversy on the ...
Estrada, Fernando
core +1 more source
Las falacias en las teorías contemporáneas de la argumentación
In this paper we use Hansson’s concept of formalized philosophy and the linked categories of simplified idealization and perfectionist idealization, aiming to metaanalyze three theoretical approaches to human argumentation: van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s
Claudio Fuentes Bravo +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory [PDF]
Daniela Schuster
openalex +1 more source

