Results 11 to 20 of about 34,733 (235)
A Note on Statistical Hypothesis Testing: Probabilifying Modus Tollens Invalidates Its Force? Not True! [PDF]
The import or force of the result of a statistical test has long been portrayed as consistent with deductive reasoning. The simplest form of deductive argument has a first premise with conditional form, such as p→q, which means that “if p is true, then q
Widaman KF.
europepmc +2 more sources
Negation of Conditionals in Natural Language and Thought
External negation of conditionals occurs in sentences beginning with ‘It is not true that if’ or similar phrases, and it is not rare in natural language. A conditional may also be denied by another with the same antecedent and opposite consequent.
Gilberto Gomes
semanticscholar +1 more source
A counteridentical is a counterfactual with an identity statement in the antecedent. While counteridenticals generally seem non-trivial, most semantic theories for counterfactuals, when combined with the necessity of identity and distinctness, attribute ...
Alexander W. Kocurek +73 more
core +1 more source
Wagenmakers et al. addressed the illogic use of p-values in 'Psychological Science under Scrutiny'. While historical criticisms mostly deal with the illogical nature of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), Wagenmakers et al.
Perezgonzalez, JD
core +2 more sources
MODUS PONENS AND MODUS TOLLENS: THEIR VALIDITY/INVALIDITY IN NATURAL LANGUAGE ARGUMENTS
The precedent studies on the validity of Modus ponens and Modus tollens have been carried out with most regard to a major type of conditionals in which the conditional clause is a sufficient condition for the main clause.
Ri Yong-Sok
doaj +1 more source
Experimental philosophy and moral responsibility [PDF]
Can experimental philosophy help us answer central questions about the nature of moral responsibility, such as the question of whether moral responsibility is compatible with determinism?
Björnsson, Gunnar
core
Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
Much psychological research on argumentation focuses on persuasion and pragmatics. However, one strand investigates how average people understand the nature of knowledge and knowing, and how these epistemological orientations underlie skilled ...
Michael P. Weinstock
doaj +1 more source
The explanationist argument for moral realism [PDF]
In this paper I argue that the explanationist argument in favour of moral realism fails. According to this argument, the ability of putative moral properties to feature in good explanations provides strong evidence for, or entails, the metaphysical ...
Neil Sinclair, Nottingham Ng Rd
core +3 more sources
The Zen of Argument Analysis: Reflections on Informal Logic's Argument Evaluation Contest
An argumentative passage that might appear to be an instance of denying the antecedent will generally admit of an alternative interpretation, one on which the conditional contained by the passage is a preface to the argument rather than a premise of it ...
Don S. Levi
doaj +1 more source
Abstract Many studies and initiatives are animated by the potential for science education to intervene in the climate crisis and crises of environmental degradation and disinformation. For science teachers to learn to address these issues in their classes, their teaching must expand beyond scientific facts and face controversial social aspects. Dealing
Valeria M. Cabello +2 more
wiley +1 more source

