Results 161 to 170 of about 12,528 (223)
Towards a Practical Climate Ethics: Combining Two Approaches to Guide Ethical Decision-Making in Concrete Climate Governance Contexts. [PDF]
Voisard A, Wallimann-Helmer I.
europepmc +1 more source
Discourse analysis: A useful methodology for health-care system researches.
Yazdannik A, Yousefy A, Mohammadi S.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Philosophy Compass, 2018
Abstract Divine Foundationalism (DF) is the thesis that God is the existential source of all things apart from God hirself. In this paper, I provide some contemporary structure to a debate over DF. I first discuss what the thesis is more exactly, before I discuss some main arguments for and against it.
Einar Duenger Bohn
exaly +2 more sources
Abstract Divine Foundationalism (DF) is the thesis that God is the existential source of all things apart from God hirself. In this paper, I provide some contemporary structure to a debate over DF. I first discuss what the thesis is more exactly, before I discuss some main arguments for and against it.
Einar Duenger Bohn
exaly +2 more sources
Adam Smith’s Non-foundationalism
Society, 2016This article is part of a symposium (in Society) on a target article by Amitai Etzioni. Using that article as a point of departure, I take the opportunity to elaborate a reading of Adam Smith’s moral philosophy that sees it as quite non-foundationalist. Whereas foundationalism’s metaphor is a block or pillar, as non-foundationalism’s metaphor I suggest
exaly +2 more sources
2018
Some foundationalists are rationalists who rely on intuition and deduction. Others are empiricists, in a broad sense, and accept observation and induction or abduction or yet other ways to support beliefs by means of other beliefs. What they have in common is that they are all willing to hazard a positive view about what in general makes a belief ...
+4 more sources
Some foundationalists are rationalists who rely on intuition and deduction. Others are empiricists, in a broad sense, and accept observation and induction or abduction or yet other ways to support beliefs by means of other beliefs. What they have in common is that they are all willing to hazard a positive view about what in general makes a belief ...
+4 more sources

