Results 31 to 40 of about 13,763,316 (290)

Indirect treatment comparison of cenobamate to other ASMs for the treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures [PDF]

open access: yesEpilepsy & Behavior, 2022
The efficacy and safety of cenobamate relative to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) has not been evaluated. An indirect treatment comparison (network meta-analysis) was performed to determine if adjunctive cenobamate increases the odds ratio (OR) for ≥50% responder rate or for withdrawals due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to ...
Michael, Privitera   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Control strategies to prevent total hip replacement-related infections: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison [PDF]

open access: yes, 2014
Objective: To synthesise the available evidence and estimate the comparative efficacy of control strategies to prevent total hip replacement (THR)-related surgical site infections (SSIs) using a mixed treatment comparison.\ud Design: Systematic review ...
Cooper, N   +24 more
core   +2 more sources

A comparison of relative-efficacy estimate(s) derived from both matching-adjusted indirect comparisons and standard anchored indirect treatment comparisons

open access: yes, 2023
ObjectivesWe present an empirical comparison of relative-efficacy estimate(s) from matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) with estimates from corresponding standard anchored indirect treatment comparisons.MethodsA total of 80 comparisons were ...
Owen Cassidy (16963461)   +6 more
core   +1 more source

Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence [PDF]

open access: yesBMJ, 2005
How can policy makers decide which of five treatments is the best?
Caldwell, DM, Ades, AE, Higgins, JPT
openaire   +3 more sources

Arbitrated Indirect Treatment Comparisons

open access: yesTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Abstract Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) has been increasingly employed in health technology assessments (HTA). By reweighting subjects from a trial with individual participant data (IPD) to match the covariate summary statistics of another trial with only aggregate data (AgD), MAIC facilitates the estimation of a treatment
Yixin Fang, Weili He
openaire   +4 more sources

Multiple treatment and indirect treatment comparisons: An overview of network meta-analysis

open access: yesPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2014
Randomized control trials and its meta-analysis has occupied the pinnacle in levels of evidence available for research. However, there were several limitations of these trials. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a recent tool for evidence-based medicine that draws strength from direct and indirect evidence generated from randomized control trials.
Nidhi Bhatnagar   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Summary results of meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison.

open access: yes, 2016
Summary results of meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison.
Hengjin Dong (398458)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Venetoclax‐Based Therapy as a Bridge to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric Acute Leukemia

open access: yesPediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) pediatric acute leukemia carries a dismal prognosis, largely driven by chemoresistance to conventional salvage therapy. The BH3‐mimetic venetoclax, combined with chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents, has demonstrated efficacy in small clinical trials.
Katherine S. Colman   +9 more
wiley   +1 more source

Methods Used for Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Treatments for Psoriasis. A Systematic Review

open access: yesSkin Health and Disease, 2022
Abstract Background Indirect comparisons (including network meta-analyses [NMAs]) allow us to compare benefits and risks of multiple interventions for the same clinical condition when head-to-head comparisons are not feasible. Objective
Alexander Nast   +5 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Increasing transparency in indirect treatment comparisons: is selecting effect modifiers the missing part of the puzzle? A review of methodological approaches and critical considerations

open access: yesJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2023
Failure to adjust for effect modifiers (EMs) in indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) can produce biased and uncertain effect estimates. This is particularly important for health technology assessments (HTAs), where the availability of new treatments ...
Andreas Freitag   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy