Results 211 to 220 of about 3,299 (264)

Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes. [PDF]

Arch Sex Behav
Wright CM.
europepmc   +1 more source

Perceived barriers and learning anxiety in online education among domestic and international students. [PDF]

Front Psychol
Yu C.
europepmc   +1 more source

Between Exclusion and Legitimacy: Identity Negotiation and Ethical Dilemmas of Chinese Lesbians in the Assisted Reproduction System. [PDF]

Dev World Bioeth
Liu Y.
europepmc   +1 more source

Investigating annotator bias in comment quality and incivility classification by formal education. [PDF]

Front Artif Intell
Wilms L, Stoll A, Ziegele M.
europepmc   +1 more source

A Child-Centered Framework for Determining Mental Distress Severity and Liability: Evidence from Chinese Judicial Practice. [PDF]

Behav Sci (Basel)
Xue Q, Yu D, Zhang Z.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Generating legal arguments

Knowledge-Based Systems, 1989
Legal reasoning in the Common Law system has elements of reasoning by analogy, of reasoning from example, and certain characteristics which are unique. A legal expert system must provide a sophisticated level of justification for its advice, for the justification is the system's most important product.
Alan Tyree, Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation

Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2011
This paper proposes to integrate an argumentation framework with techniques from Temporal Constraint Satisfaction. Temporal constraints are thus embedded into legal argumentation to account for temporal aspects of legal reasoning. Through the accommodation of temporal constraints, the validity of arguments and of their conclusions is made relative to ...
RIVERET, REGIS, ROTOLO, ANTONINO, CONTISSA, GIUSEPPE, SARTOR, GIOVANNI, W. Vasconcelos   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning

2009
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning.
Bench Capon T., Prakken H., SARTOR, GIOVANNI   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

The uses of Precedent in Legal Argument

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022
Abstract Courts rely on authoritative judicial precedents by deploying different types of argument. They (a) apply the ratio decidendi of previous cases to the case before them, (b) deploy legal analogies, (c) argue a fortiori, (d) argue a simile, (e) infer more general principles, inter alia.
openaire   +1 more source