Results 31 to 40 of about 135,913 (298)
The argumentation in workplace accident trials. The case of the civil court of Mons (1870-1904)
Clio@Themis, 2021 At the end of the nineteenth century, workplace accident trials increased significantly in number in Belgium and in other European countries. These cases are interesting, as they have a hybrid character, with a unique blend of industrial and legal ...
Bruno Debaenst
doaj +1 more source
Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts [PDF]
, 2015 Shared decision-making requires doctors to be competent in exchanging views with patients to identify the appropriate course of action. In this paper we focus on the potential of a course in argumentation as a promising way to empower doctors in ...
Atzeni, Fabiola +4 more
core +3 more sources
Advanced Robotics Research, EarlyView.A soft robotic simulator is developed to replicate the digital removal of feces (DRF), a sensitive yet essential nursing procedure. Integrating soft actuators, sensors, and a realistic rectal model, the simulator balances functional fidelity with perceptual realism. Engineering evaluations and nurse feedback confirm its potential to enhance training in
Shoko Miyagawa +10 more
wiley +1 more source
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 2023 Legal-political Ideas as Elements of Argumentation in Court Speeches – Remarks on the Communists’ Trials in Lwów (1922–1923) The legacy of legal-political ideologists is seldom used as an element of
Marcin Niemczyk
doaj +1 more source
FILSAFAT HUKUM: Aktualisasi Critical Legal Studies Di Indonesia
Al-Manhaj, 2022 This paper discusses Critical Legal Studies as a critical study of law that opposes the school of legal formalism. As a critical study, Critical Legal Studies accommodates not only Marxist legal ideas, but also liberal-radical and postmodernism.
Dudang Gojali
doaj +1 more source
Improving bioethical decision-making with a little help from legal argumentation [PDF]
, 2015 The most appropriate method for clinical decision-making is deliberation. The deliberative procedure aims to achieve wise and prudent decisions about health care taking into account facts, values and norms.
Seoane, José Antonio
core +2 more sources
Argumentation schemes for collaborative planning [PDF]
, 2011 Postprin
A. Belesiotis +4 more
core +3 more sources
Competition Policy and Agribusiness in the Biden Administration
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, EarlyView.ABSTRACT The Biden Administration pursued a set of ambitious competition policy initiatives in agriculture and agribusiness, primarily aimed at livestock and poultry supply chains, farm inputs, and food retailing. The initiatives included expanded antitrust enforcement; new US Department of Agriculture (USDA) contract regulations requiring poultry ...
James M. MacDonald
wiley +1 more source
The South African Constitutional Court Experience: Reasoning Patterns Based on Foreign Law
Utrecht Law Review, 2012 This article aims to analyse the phenomenon of the diffusion of interpretive paradigms or argumentation models between constitutional courts. This phenomenon involves the importation of parameters - defined here as extra-systemic to a specific legal ...
Andrea Lollini
doaj +1 more source
Generalization in Legal Argumentation [PDF]
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 2019 When interpreting a natural language argument that generalizes over a contextually relevant category, audiences are likely to activate the category prototype and transfer its characteristics onto c...
Frank Zenker +4 more
openaire +1 more source