Results 51 to 60 of about 135,913 (298)
The Reconstruction of Legal Analogy-Argumentation: Monological and Dialogical Approaches [PDF]
, 1997 In this contribution two approaches of legal analogy-argumentation will be discussed: the traditional, monological approach and the dialogical approach.
Kloosterhuis, Harrm
core +1 more source
A Model of Critical Thinking in Higher Education [PDF]
, 2014 “Critical thinking in higher education” is a phrase that means many things to many people. It is a broad church. Does it mean a propensity for finding fault? Does it refer to an analytical method? Does it mean an ethical attitude or a
Davies, Martin
core +1 more source
Agribusiness, EarlyView.ABSTRACT The cocoa‐chocolate value chain faces significant environmental and social challenges, driving firms to adopt sustainability strategies ranging from individual practices to third‐party certifications. This study investigates the factors associated with these strategies by analyzing 304 cocoa‐chocolate companies using firm‐level data from the ...
Stella Marschner +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Preface: Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation
Informal Logic, 2016 Preface
Michał Araszkiewicz, Thomasz Zurek
doaj +3 more sources
A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi [PDF]
, 2012 Carneades is an open source argument mapping application and a programming library for building argumentation support tools. In this paper, Carneades’ support for argument reconstruction, evaluation and visualization is illustrated by modeling most of ...
Gordon, Thomas F., Walton, Douglas
core +3 more sources
Access to Finance and Innovation in the Canadian Food Processing
Agribusiness, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Innovation is a presumed channel through which finance affects productivity, yet there is limited research testing the relationship between finance and innovation in the food manufacturing sector. The purpose of the paper is to explore the determinants (e.g., financing, R&D, firm size, expenditure on innovation) of the adoption of innovation ...
Getu Hailu, Deepananda Herath
wiley +1 more source
In view of an express regulation: Considering the scope and soundness of a contrario reasoning
Informal Logic, 2008 A contrario reasoning (or ‘a contrario argument’ or ‘argument a contrario’) is traditionally understood as an appeal to the deliberate silence of the legislator: because a legal rule does not mention case X specifically, the rule is not applicable to it.
Henrike Jansen
doaj +1 more source
Legal Heuristics and the Positivisation of Law in Dogmatic Discourse
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica, 2023 The general opinion that the text of the law does not imply its use leads to an understanding of the role that legal dogmatics and legal practice can play in solving this problem.
Jerzy Leszczyński
doaj +1 more source
An Argumentation-Theoretic Characterization of Defeasible Logic [PDF]
, 2000 Defeasible logic is an efficient non-monotonic logic that is defined only proof-theoretically. It has potential application in some legal domains. We present here an argumentation semantics for defeasible logic that will be useful in these applications ...
Governatori, Guido, Maher, Michael J.
core +3 more sources
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, 2018 The article discusses the interdisciplinary systemic juridical argumentation. We propose to elevate the legal argumentation to a complete and integral level.
Jorge Isaac Torres Manrique
doaj +1 more source