Results 21 to 30 of about 382,587 (364)

Motivations, experiences, and aspirations in patient engagement of people living with metastatic cancer

, 2021
The objective of this patient-led study was to explore the motivations, experiences, and aspirations of people living with metastatic cancer who volunteer in patient engagement.
Duran, Leslie, Patricia L Stoop, Leslie Duran, Stoop, Patricia L, Patricia Stoop   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Correction to: Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research

Health Research Policy and Systems, 2018
It has been highlighted that the original manuscript [1] contains a typesetting error in the surname of Virginia Vandall-Walker. This was incorrectly captured as Virgnia Vandall-Walker in the original manuscript which has since been updated.
Elizabeth Manafo, Lisa Petermann, Ping Mason-Lai, Virginia Vandall-Walker   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research

Health Research Policy and Systems, 2018
Background Over the last 10 years, patient engagement in health research has emerged as the next evolution in healthcare research. However, limited evidence about the clear role and scope of patient engagement in health research and a lack of evidence ...
Elizabeth Manafo, Lisa Petermann, Ping Mason-Lai, Virginia Vandall-Walker   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

The Patient Engagement Prescription [PDF]

North Carolina Medical Journal, 2015
Written by a volunteer patient advisor, this issue brief provides at 50-foot view of patient engagement as seen through the eyes of various stakeholders including payers, providers, and patients. The benefits and barriers are noted, and the undeniable need for engaged patients is discussed.
openaire   +2 more sources

Identifying sources of patient dissatisfaction when seeking care for a chronic and complex disease

, 2023
Patients’ evaluations of healthcare often rely on patient satisfaction and encounter-specific approaches. Instead, valuable information can be gained by focusing on patient dissatisfaction with healthcare over time.
Harsin, Amanda, Katharine J Head, Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis, Amanda Harsin, Anna K Forster, Bartlett Ellis, Rebecca J, Head, Katharine J, Forster, Anna K., Bartlett Ellis, Rebecca J., Head, Katharine J., Forster, Anna K   +10 more
core   +1 more source

Patient-centered benefit-risk analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2019
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) treatments include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Choosing between SAVR and TAVR requires patients to trade-off  benefits and risks.
Kevin Marsh, Natalia Hawken, Ella Brookes, Carrie Kuehn, Barry Liden   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

The Provincial Patient and Family Group (PFG) for Alberta Health Services Transforms How Care is Planned and Delivered: A Decade of Experience

Journal of Patient Experience, 2021
Although many health care organizations made significant headway in building relationships with patients and families at the point of care, there continues to be opportunities to partner with them at the system level.
Deanna Picklyk MSW, MBA (c), RSW, Shawn Volk BScN, Katharina Kovacs Burns MSc, MHSA, PhD   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Patient-centric culture and implications for patient engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic

, 2020
Some consider patient engagement as the “holy grail” of healthcare because of its potential to revolutionize how we view and address health system problems.
Majid, Umair, Umair Majid, Aghna Wasim, Wasim, Aghna   +3 more
core   +1 more source

Patient-centered benefit-risk analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

F1000Research, 2019
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) treatments include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Choosing between SAVR and TAVR requires patients to trade-off  benefits and risks.
Kevin Marsh, Natalia Hawken, Ella Brookes, Carrie Kuehn, Barry Liden   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems

Health Expectations, 2023
Introduction Recent shifts in the patient, family and caregiver engagement field have focused greater attention on measurement and evaluation, including the impacts of engagement efforts.
Julia Abelson, Laura Tripp, Maggie MacNeil, Amy Lang, Carol Fancott, Rebecca Ganann, Marisa Granieri, Cathie Hofstetter, Bernice King, Betty‐Lou Kristy, Alies Maybee, Maureen Smith, Jeonghwa You, The Evaluating Patient Engagement Working Group   +13 more
doaj   +1 more source