Results 1 to 10 of about 3,649,087 (192)
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]
Royal Society Open Science, 2016 Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability ...
Richard D. Morey +12 more
doaj +15 more sources
Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed
Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2004 Zusammenfassung Der Aufsatz bietet einen Überblick über die Hauptfelder der Peer Review Forschung, also jenes Segments der Wissenschaftsforschung, das sich mit dem zentralen Evaluationsverfahren wissenschaftlicher Praxis befasst.
Stefan Hirschauer
openaire +2 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles.
Mohammad Hosseini, S. Horbach
semanticscholar +1 more source
BMC Medical Education, 2021 Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto +19 more
doaj +1 more source
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences at a Glance: The Past and Present [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023 After more than 50 years of its birth, the Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (IJMS), formerly known as Pahlavi Medical Journal, is now regarded as a reputable, regularly published medical journal in the region.
Mohammad Reza Panjehshahin
doaj +1 more source
What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2022 Introduction Allocation of research funds relies on peer review to support funding decisions, and these processes can be susceptible to biases and inefficiencies.
A. Recio-Saucedo +6 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Learned Publishing, 2023 Technology is being developed to support the peer review processes of journals, conferences, funders, universities, and national research evaluations. This literature and software summary discusses the partial or complete automation of several publishing‐
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall
semanticscholar +1 more source
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2021 The amount and value of researchers’ peer review work is critical for academia and journal publishing. However, this labor is under-recognized, its magnitude is unknown, and alternative ways of organizing peer review labor are rarely considered.
B. Aczél +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
Rheumatology, 2021 The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science ...
Olena Zimba, Armen Gasparyan
openaire +3 more sources