Results 1 to 10 of about 2,877,456 (202)
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review [PDF]
Royal Society Open Science, 2016 Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability ...
Richard D. Morey +12 more
doaj +14 more sources
Are peer reviewers influenced by their work being cited? [PDF]
eLifePeer reviewers sometimes comment that their own journal articles should be cited by the journal article under review. Comments concerning relevant articles can be justified, but comments can also be unrelated coercive citations.
Adrian Barnett
doaj +2 more sources
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences at a Glance: The Past and Present [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2023 After more than 50 years of its birth, the Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (IJMS), formerly known as Pahlavi Medical Journal, is now regarded as a reputable, regularly published medical journal in the region.
Mohammad Reza Panjehshahin
doaj +1 more source
BMC Medical Education, 2021 Background Research engagement contributes to the improvement of patient care. A systematic review is a suitable first scholarly activity because it entails summarization of publicly available data and usually requires neither rigorous ethical review nor
Hiraku Tsujimoto +19 more
doaj +1 more source
Proposal for ‘segmented peer review’ of multidisciplinary papers
Translational Oncology, 2021 We propose a new process for peer review of multidisciplinary journal submissions called ‘segmented peer review’. The current translational research environment increasingly requires complex and multidisciplinary studies that span multiple distinct ...
Deepak Dinakaran, [MD, PhD] +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Scientific peer review in the modern era: A comprehensive guide
Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 2022 The scientific peer review process involves scrutinizing the work of researchers by a panel of scientific experts who are selected by the journal to which they have submitted a manuscript.
Nimrat Kaur Sandhu +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives [PDF]
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2023 Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields.
Hyun Kang, Hyoung-Chul Oh
doaj +1 more source
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
Rheumatology, 2021 The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science ...
Olena Zimba, Armen Gasparyan
openaire +3 more sources
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: perspectives [PDF]
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2023 Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not yet been peer-reviewed. They have been widely adopted to promote the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields.
Hyoung-Chul Oh, Hyun Kang
doaj +1 more source