Results 41 to 50 of about 2,859,402 (254)
How to Peer Review for Scientific Journals?
International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health ResearchPeer review is the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by experts in the field. This process starts when the editor of a peer-reviewed journal sends an article or a manuscript to two or more reviewers for review.
Mukta Wyawahare
doaj +1 more source
Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2021 Background Inaccurate, false or incomplete research publications may mislead readers including researchers and decision-makers. It is therefore important that such problems are identified and rectified promptly.
Elizabeth Wager +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Responding to, and learning from, peer review feedback. [PDF]
, 2016 What is peer review in research? Peer review is the process of assessing the scientific quality of a research proposal, research report and/or paper by an independent expert, usually an academic or clinical ...
Milnes, L, Smith, J
core +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Background Psychological safety (PS) is essential for teamwork, communication, and patient safety in complex healthcare environments. In pediatric oncology, interprofessional collaboration occurs under high emotional and organizational demands. Low PS may increase stress, burnout, and adverse events.
Alexandros Rahn +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Digital Chinese Medicine, 2018 : Objective Identification of one’s constitution based on a combination of features and back propagation neural network theory is needed in modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).
Yue Luo +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Enhancing Federal Agency Peer Review [PDF]
, 2016 Peer review, the process of reviewing a piece of scientific research for accuracy and reliability, is widely used in government. It serves an important function, allowing government agencies and other groups to assess the validity of research and ...
Peterson, Ian
core +1 more source
Developmental Disorders in Children Recently Diagnosed With Cancer
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Neurocognitive deficits in adult survivors of childhood cancer are well established, but less is known about developmental disorders (DD) arising shortly after cancer diagnosis. Using 2016–2019 linked Ohio cancer registry and Medicaid data, we compared DD among 324 children with cancer and 606,913 cancer‐free controls.
Jamie Shoag +5 more
wiley +1 more source
Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2017 Background Winning funding for health and medical research usually involves a lengthy application process. With success rates under 20%, much of the time spent by 80% of applicants could have been better used on actual research.
Adrian G. Barnett +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Should infectious disease modelling research be subject to ethics review?
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2023 Should research projects involving epidemiological modelling be subject to ethical scrutiny and peer review prior to publication? Mathematical modelling had considerable impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to social distancing and lockdowns ...
Ben Green
doaj +1 more source
Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.ABSTRACT Background B‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer, and while most children in high‐resource settings are cured, therapy carries risks for long‐term toxicities. Understanding parents’ concerns about these late effects is essential to guide anticipatory support and inform evolving therapeutic approaches ...
Kellee N. Parker +7 more
wiley +1 more source