Results 11 to 20 of about 254,353 (230)

Thank You to Our Reviewers

open access: yesVeterinary Evidence, 2017
The work of a reviewer is a challenging commitment. There are no monetary rewards and their time and dedication often go unrecognised although no journal could exist without them.
Peter Cockcroft
doaj   +1 more source

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers

open access: yesPublications, 2019
Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system on a number of entities.
Francesco Pomponi   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer review: Peerless review [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006
Peer review is indeed ‘... a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works’, as Richard Smith concludes in his thoughtful article (April 2006 JRSM1)—but even flawed refereeing is better than not being peer reviewed at all.
openaire   +3 more sources

Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals

open access: yesPublications, 2023
There is a noticeable paucity of recently published research on the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers for international journals. Concurrently, the pool of these peer reviewers is decreasing.
Carol Nash
doaj   +1 more source

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports.

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2023
ObjectivesTo assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors address study funding and authors' conflicts of interests (COI). Also, we aimed to assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors reported and commented on their ...
Adham Makarem   +6 more
doaj   +3 more sources

Peer review

open access: yesVeterinary Record, 2017
Peer review for publication is fundamental to science-based fields, and nursing is no exception. Peer review provides benefits to the reviewer and the author(s) of the reviewed work. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with an explanation of how the peer review process works, what the responsibilities of a peer reviewer are, how to get ...
  +9 more sources

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

open access: yesPharmacy Practice, 2018
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript.
Fernandez-Llimos F   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer reviewers

open access: yesAltre Modernità, 2020
Peer ...
Emanuele Monegato
doaj   +1 more source

Reviewing Peer Review [PDF]

open access: yesScience, 2008
Peer review, in which experts in the field scrutinize and critique scientific results prior to publication, is fundamental to scientific progress, and the achievements of science in the last century are an endorsement of its value. Peer review influences more than just science.
Bruce, Alberts   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study

open access: yesBMJ Open, 2020
Objective To generate an understanding of the communication practices that might influence the peer-review process in biomedical journals.Method Recruitment was based on purposive maximum variation sampling. We conducted semistructured interviews.
David Moher   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy