Results 11 to 20 of about 254,353 (230)
The work of a reviewer is a challenging commitment. There are no monetary rewards and their time and dedication often go unrecognised although no journal could exist without them.
Peter Cockcroft
doaj +1 more source
Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
Scientific publishing is experiencing unprecedented growth in terms of outputs across all fields. Inevitably this creates pressure throughout the system on a number of entities.
Francesco Pomponi +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Peer review: Peerless review [PDF]
Peer review is indeed ‘... a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works’, as Richard Smith concludes in his thoughtful article (April 2006 JRSM1)—but even flawed refereeing is better than not being peer reviewed at all.
openaire +3 more sources
Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals
There is a noticeable paucity of recently published research on the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers for international journals. Concurrently, the pool of these peer reviewers is decreasing.
Carol Nash
doaj +1 more source
Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports.
ObjectivesTo assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors address study funding and authors' conflicts of interests (COI). Also, we aimed to assess the extent to which peer reviewers and journals editors reported and commented on their ...
Adham Makarem +6 more
doaj +3 more sources
Peer review for publication is fundamental to science-based fields, and nursing is no exception. Peer review provides benefits to the reviewer and the author(s) of the reviewed work. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with an explanation of how the peer review process works, what the responsibilities of a peer reviewer are, how to get ...
+9 more sources
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript.
Fernandez-Llimos F +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Peer review, in which experts in the field scrutinize and critique scientific results prior to publication, is fundamental to scientific progress, and the achievements of science in the last century are an endorsement of its value. Peer review influences more than just science.
Bruce, Alberts +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Objective To generate an understanding of the communication practices that might influence the peer-review process in biomedical journals.Method Recruitment was based on purposive maximum variation sampling. We conducted semistructured interviews.
David Moher +3 more
doaj +1 more source

