Results 41 to 50 of about 280,617 (296)
Current Biology, 2000 Funds awarded after peer review of grant applications by committees established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) directly affects the careers of many biomedical scientists. The scientific tastes and judgments of peer review committees also shape fields by favoring specific questions and approaches to particular scientific opportunities that ...
openaire +2 more sources
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.We reconstituted Synechocystis glycogen synthesis in vitro from purified enzymes and showed that two GlgA isoenzymes produce glycogen with different architectures: GlgA1 yields denser, highly branched glycogen, whereas GlgA2 synthesizes longer, less‐branched chains.
Kenric Lee +3 more
wiley +1 more source
JLIS.it, 2022 Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publication in scholarly journals. However, the process of peer review is not free of bias and disorders.
Rahmatollah Fattahi +2 more
doaj +1 more source
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.We identified a systemic, progressive loss of protein S‐glutathionylation—detected by nonreducing western blotting—alongside dysregulation of glutathione‐cycle enzymes in both neuronal and peripheral tissues of Taiwanese SMA mice. These alterations were partially rescued by SMN antisense oligonucleotide therapy, revealing persistent redox imbalance as ...
Sofia Vrettou, Brunhilde Wirth
wiley +1 more source
Editorial: What reviewers want: How to make your article more appealing to peer reviewers
, 2013 It is the bane of the life of all researchers in health psychology and behavioural medicine; after spending many weeks, months and even years preparing a research article from inception to submission only to have it rejected by journal editors on the ...
Hagger, Martin S, Hagger, Martin
core +1 more source
Practical Tips of English Expressions for Non-Native English-Speaking Peer Reviewers
Vascular Specialist International, 2021 Peer review is an essential part in ensuring the quality of papers published in scientific journals. Good reviews are beneficial for both authors and journal editors by providing authors with the opportunity to improve their manuscripts and editors with ...
Mikyoung Lee
doaj +1 more source
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.In this study, we found that human cervical‐derived adipocytes maintain intracellular iron level by regulating the expression of iron transport‐related proteins during adrenergic stimulation. Melanotransferrin is predicted to interact with transferrin receptor 1 based on in silico analysis.
Rahaf Alrifai +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 2017 Peer review for publication is fundamental to science-based fields, and nursing is no exception. Peer review provides benefits to the reviewer and the author(s) of the reviewed work. The purpose of this article is to provide readers with an explanation of how the peer review process works, what the responsibilities of a peer reviewer are, how to get ...
+9 more sources