Results 41 to 50 of about 519,096 (286)

Acknowledgements

open access: yesEngaged Scholar Journal, 2023
Engaged Scholar Journal
doaj   +5 more sources

Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors

open access: yesJLIS.it, 2022
Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publication in scholarly journals. However, the process of peer review is not free of bias and disorders.
Rahmatollah Fattahi   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer Reviewers Describe Success in Grant Writing [PDF]

open access: yes, 1992
This article presents a comment on success in grant writing. According to the survey of 92 administrators of mass communication programs, successful grant applications rank in the top 10 in importance to successful faculty performance.
Pokrywczynski, James
core   +1 more source

The Fate (Outcome) of Clinically Apparent Single Lesion and Oligofocal Nephroblastomatosis Treated According to SIOP/GPOH Protocols for Wilms Tumor

open access: yesPediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background The management of clinically apparent single lesions or oligofocal nephroblastomatosis, a facultative precursor of nephroblastoma, remains debated. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 37 patients with clinically apparent single or oligofocal nephroblastomatosis (two to three lesions per kidney) among 2347 patients registered between
Nils Welter   +17 more
wiley   +1 more source

Practical Tips of English Expressions for Non-Native English-Speaking Peer Reviewers

open access: yesVascular Specialist International, 2021
Peer review is an essential part in ensuring the quality of papers published in scientific journals. Good reviews are beneficial for both authors and journal editors by providing authors with the opportunity to improve their manuscripts and editors with ...
Mikyoung Lee
doaj   +1 more source

Recognition and reward system for peer-reviewers [PDF]

open access: yes, 2018
Peer reviewing plays an important role in the academic publishing process that scrutinizes and provides feedback on the scientific work prior to publication.
Jan, Zeeshan
core  

Selenium and tellurium concentrations of Carboniferous British coals [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
The authors wish to thank Kier Group, the British Coal Utilisation Research Association (BCURA) and Uniper (E.On) for kindly providing coal samples.
Armstrong, Joseph   +7 more
core   +1 more source

An upstream open reading frame regulates expression of the mitochondrial protein Slm35 and mitophagy flux

open access: yesFEBS Letters, EarlyView.
This study reveals how the mitochondrial protein Slm35 is regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The authors identify stress‐responsive DNA elements and two upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in the 5′ untranslated region of SLM35. One uORF restricts translation, and its mutation increases Slm35 protein levels and mitophagy.
Hernán Romo‐Casanueva   +5 more
wiley   +1 more source

Electronic Publication of VSI Articles One by One: A Paradigm Shift for Easy Accessibility, More Citations, and Survival of the Fitter

open access: yesVascular Specialist International, 2021
Peer review is an essential part in ensuring the quality of papers published in scientific journals. Good reviews are beneficial for both authors and journal editors by providing authors with the opportunity to improve their manuscripts and editors with ...
Suh Min Kim, Soo Ho Kim, Seung-Kee Min
doaj   +1 more source

Environmentally induced phenotypic variation in wild yellow-bellied marmots [PDF]

open access: yes, 2016
We thank all the marmoteers who helped in data collection and 2 anonymous reviewers who helped us to clarify our message. AM-C was supported by a Fulbright Fellowship, and JGAM was supported by Fond Québécois de Recherche sur la Nature et les ...
Armitage, Kenneth B.   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy